Share to:

 

Mineralogy v Western Australia

Mineralogy v Western Australia
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Full case name Mineralogy Pty Ltd & Anor v. State of Western Australia
Decided13 October 2021
Citation[2021] HCA 30
Transcripts
Court membership
Judges sittingKiefel CJ, Gageler, Keane, Gordon, Edelman, Steward, Glesson JJ
Case opinions
The Iron Ore Processing (Mineralogy Pty Ltd) Agreement Amendment Act 2020 is not invalid or inoperative in its entirety

Mineralogy v Western Australia was a case heard by the High Court of Australia at the same time as Palmer v Western Australia in 2020 and 2021, which held that the Iron Ore Processing (Mineralogy Pty Ltd) Agreement Amendment Act 2020 was not invalid or inoperative in its entirety.[1]

Background

In 2002, the Western Australian government and Clive Palmer entered into an agreement—the Iron Ore Processing (Mineralogy Pty Ltd) Agreement Act 2002, as permitted under the Government Agreements Act 1979[2]—which established the mining rights of Palmer and seven of his companies in Western Australia. In 2012, the WA government declined to assess Mineralogy's Balmoral South iron ore mining proposal. Arbitration decisions in 2014 and 2018 were favourable to Palmer and Mineralogy,[3] with the company initiating a third arbitration in July 2020 in which it claimed up to $30 billion in damages stemming from the WA Government's decision not to approve the Balmoral South proposal.[4][5] In response to the claim, which the Premier Mark McGowan said would be equivalent to "every man, woman, and child in the state owing $12,000 each" or the entire annual state budget, the WA introduced passed emergency legislation to block it.[6][7]

The Iron Ore Processing (Mineralogy Pty Ltd) Agreement Amendment Act 2020 was passed on 13 August 2020 by the Upper House of the WA parliament after being argued for ten hours, with royal assent given by WA Governor Kim Beazley at 10.30pm. Shortly after it passed, Palmer said that he would take WA to the High Court.[7]

Writs of summons were issued on 14 September 2020 and 18 September 2020 for Palmer v Western Australia and Mineralogy v Western Australia respectively.[8] At a hearing on 30 September 2020 before Kiefel CJ, it was decided that they were to be heard together, as they had "so many common issues".[9]

Decision

The High Court's unanimous decision was handed down on 13 October 2021,[1] with its reasons published the same day.[8] The court found that the Iron Ore Processing (Mineralogy Pty Ltd) Agreement Amendment Act 2020 was not invalid or inoperative in its entirety, and that sections 9(1), 9(2), and 10(4-7) were not invalid or inoperative to any extent. Sub-questions answered by the court, each of which were answered "No", were:[1]

First, did the manner of enactment of the Amending Act contravene s 6 of the Australia Act 1986 (Cth)? Second, did the Amending Act exceed some limitation on the legislative power of the Parliament of Western Australia arising from the rule of law or deeply rooted common law rights? Third, were ss 9(1), 9(2) and 10(4)-(7) of the State Act invalid on the basis that they were incompatible with Ch III of the Constitution? Fourth, were the same provisions invalid on the basis that they were incompatible with s 118 of the Constitution? Fifth, did the Amending Act single out Mr Palmer for a "disability" or "discrimination" of a kind forbidden by s 117 of the Constitution?

Consequences

As a result of the court's decision, the Iron Ore Processing (Mineralogy Pty Ltd) Agreement Amendment Act 2020 continued in force, with WA shielded from the $28 billion damages claim.[10][11] Premier McGowan said on Facebook that "Time and time again, Clive Palmer has attempted to bring our state down — first, by challenging the hard border that kept Western Australians safe through a pandemic, and then by launching an outrageous legal claim for damages", and "Today's win is proof that our government will never stop fighting for the people of Western Australia." McGowan also said that had the claim for damages been upheld, it would have bankrupted WA. Attorney-General John Quigley called the claim for damages "ridiculous" and that the legislation passed was to "stop this greedy grab for Western Australia's money which would have been doubling our debt". Palmer and Mineralogy were required to pay costs, which according to Quigley were $2 million on top of $1 million already incurred over the High Court challenge to the WA hard border in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.[11][12][13][14]

McGowan labelled Palmer an "enemy of the state".[15][16]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c "Judgment summary" (PDF). High Court of Australia. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  2. ^ "Government Agreements Act 1979" (PDF). Western Australian Legislation. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  3. ^ Rosenberg, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP-Kim; Calvy, Jamie (2021-11-09). "Australian judicial approval of mining legislation designed to prevent arbitration: alternative legal avenues and wider implications". Lexology. Retrieved 2022-09-12.
  4. ^ "Clive Palmer launches legal action seeking $30b in damages from WA". ABC News. 2020-08-11. Retrieved 2022-09-13.
  5. ^ "WA in crisis over Clive Palmer's $30b damages claim". Australian Financial Review. 2020-08-11. Retrieved 2022-09-13.
  6. ^ "Palmer's $30b lawsuit 'would cripple WA'". www.9news.com.au. 12 August 2020. Retrieved 2022-09-13.
  7. ^ a b Hondros, Heather McNeill, Nathan (2020-08-13). "WA Governor signs off emergency law to prevent Clive Palmer's '$30b lawsuit'". WAtoday. Retrieved 2022-09-13.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. ^ a b "Case B52/2020". High Court of Australia. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  9. ^ Palmer v The State of Western Australia; Mineralogy Pty Ltd & Anor v State of Western Australia, 2020-09-30, retrieved 2022-09-13
  10. ^ Hastie, Hamish (2021-10-13). "'Time he cut his losses': Palmer's $28b shot at WA government fails in High Court". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2022-09-13.
  11. ^ a b "WA Premier says Clive Palmer's High Court loss 'a monumental victory' for state". ABC News. 2021-10-12. Retrieved 2022-09-13.
  12. ^ "Clive Palmer LOSES High Court battle against WA laws stopping $30 billion lawsuit". 7NEWS. 2021-10-13. Retrieved 2022-09-13.
  13. ^ "Clive Palmer loses high court battle against WA for right to sue state". www.9news.com.au. 13 October 2021. Retrieved 2022-09-13.
  14. ^ "Clive Palmer loses high court battle with WA over law blocking mine compensation bid". the Guardian. 2021-10-13. Retrieved 2022-09-13.
  15. ^ Daile Cross; Nathan Hondros (31 July 2020). "'I think he's the enemy of Australia': McGowan ramps up war of words with Palmer on WA border battle". The Sydney Morning Herald. Fairfax Media. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
  16. ^ Weber, David (30 July 2020). "Clive Palmer claims Mark McGowan's coronavirus hard border will destroy lives of West Australians". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya