Template talk:2017 Arena Football League standings

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Arena Football League This template is within the scope of WikiProject Arena Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the AFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arena Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject Arena Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject Arena Football LeagueArena Football League

Hi, since I know the superscript number key was used in the past to show playoff seeding (i.e. pre-2016), would it be fair to include this key in this table as well, as not all teams make the playoffs this year, unlike last year? Jd02022092 (talk) 00:14, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging the regular editors of the 2015 templates @WikiOriginal-9: @DMC511: @Tampabay721: @Redlarsen: to help fuel this debate. Also, I recently undid a possible test edit by an IP as for this season only, semifinal and 1st round refer to the same round of the postseason this year. Would it make more sense to refer this round by the former or the latter in this case? jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) 23:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beings how there is no divisional or conference alignment, why is this necessary? DMC511 (talk) 20:31, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My point exactly if this is about the 1st round/semifinal issue. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) 20:36, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No to superscripts. Yes to semifinals. Tampabay721 (talk) 18:14, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]