This template is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
Why are some links in the template formatted as bold? When using a template to navigate thru articles, the article's name becomes bold automagically by the MediaWiki software when one is on that article's page. By having links already bolded, it gives the appearance one is viewing the wrong article. If a notation is needed in the template, using italics would be best, and adding a note or key of some sort to explain the designation. — MrDolomite • Talk16:24, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Bold on some of the names is there to highlight the most important people, I copied the way the Greek mathematics template was designed. But you may be right that its a bit confusing, especially since in Greek astronomy there are only a few really famous names. I shall remove the Bold formatting, and see how it looks, it may be better this way. Singinglemon (talk) 18:24, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That looks good. I wouldn't know an important Greek astronomer from an unimportant one; it's all Greek to me (sorry, bad pun, had to do it :) The WP:GNOME in me checks templates to make sure the correct link is highlighted when navigating to each article. Everyone in the Astronomers section checked out fine, well done. Many times an article will get moved or redirected and while the reader ends up at the correct spot, the link names don't match to the template and thus don't bold as they should. Thanks for all the Greek work, or rather Ευχαριστίες για όλη την ελληνική εργασία. — MrDolomite • Talk22:06, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Definition of ancient Greece
What is the definition of Ancient Greek being used here? The bulk of the scholars referenced lived several centuries BCE, a few flourished in the Roman era, after 146BCE, and a minute number of listings are from AD dates, including the 1st century Agrippa (astronomer) and the 2nd century Sosigenes the Peripatetic and Claudius Ptolemy - are these last three really Ancient Greeks by most definitions? Iskandar323 (talk) 07:46, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The period after after 323BCE is more formally known as the Hellenistic period, and thus the template for Ancient Greek mathematics covering both of these periods uses the header "Ancient Greek and Hellenistic mathematics" - perhaps the same should be applied here, as this would cover everything through to 30 BCE, but that's still no solution for the Greco-Roman entries. Iskandar323 (talk) 07:51, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You're confusing yourself. The Hellenistic period IS part of "Ancient Greece". What normally dated to end in 323 is what is called "Classical Greece". Walrasiad (talk) 10:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Walrasiad: A source for the summary of this revert please, and explanation as to why you think this template should differ from Template:Ancient Greek mathematics, which I simply matched the phrasing with for clarity. Even this is an approximation. Technically it should be Ancient Greek, Hellenistic and Greco-Roman astronomy, since the whole template is really badly overscoped. Iskandar323 (talk) 11:07, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have broken it down for you in the talk page of the Ancient Greece article. If you still have trouble reading that article, let me know. I'd be happy to provide any further clarifications there. You are also likelier to get other editors to chime in there. Walrasiad (talk) 11:13, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]