This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ariana Grande, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ariana Grande on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ariana GrandeWikipedia:WikiProject Ariana GrandeTemplate:WikiProject Ariana GrandeAriana Grande
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Should Manchester bombing be linked in this template?
Similary, I do not think that the Manchester Arena bombing article should be linked in Grande's template. Can we get a consensus to remove it? -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:35, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a link to One Love Manchester since it's an event organised by Grande, so would be appropriate for inclusion here. At present it is a redirect, but it's notable enough for its own article. Feel free, however, to revert for now if you disagree strongly with its inclusion. This is Paul (talk) 18:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed it. There is no such article; nor should there be, as this is just one single concert. The information about it is included in other related articles, like the Dangerous Woman Tour article, Grande's own article and elsewhere. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, but there is a category for benefit concerts, so in theory it is feasible for such an article to exist. I may consider doing something with the topic if there's enough media coverage. I imagine there will be, but since the concert is yet to occur any article would be some time away. This is Paul (talk) 20:22, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm readding it because there's now an article. While I opposed the inclusion of the Manchester bombing in this template, I believe One Love Manchester's inclusion is appropriate here as the event was organised by Grande, and meets the general notability guidelines. If you disagree with this decision then I suggest we should open a discussion at Talk:Ariana Grande or some other appropriate place where consensus for one solution or the other can be reached. This is Paul (talk) 21:58, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Navbox is not remotely bloated, and readers are better served when all links relating to the same topic are found in the same place, rather than split between two templates. Navboxes are routinely merged when of a similar size to this. --woodensuperman12:48, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support. The template is becoming bloated and this will only get worse as Ariana releases more music. Also, there's artists will smaller discographies who have a separate template for songs. Fan4Life (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The template should be split into Template:Ariana Grande songs as it's becoming bloated, and this will only get worse as Ariana releases new music. Also, there's artists with smaller discographies who have a separate template for songs. Fan4Life (talk) 14:54, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support I do not know what is going on here. Fan4Life was editwarrring on Template:Ariana Grande songs to prevent a split (a split that already occurred in 2014). 16 months ago, the template was redirected to Template:Ariana Grande without any discussion. And since then the template is victim of an editwar, still without any discussion as why it should not be a separate template. So this is not a split that has to be performed, it is a case that an editwar has to be stopped and a template restored in its original form. The Bannertalk17:32, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
