Template talk:Cannabis by country

	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Cannabis This template is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis

@Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney: Thank you for creating so many stubs and expanding this template. So many articles for editors around the world to expand and improve now. Great work! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:43, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed Timeline of cannabis law is listed twice, under "General articles" and "Related". I was going to remove it from "Related", but then that would leave Cannabis political parties as the only page remaining. So I'm thinking "Cannabis political parties" could be moved under "General articles", and then "Related" can just be deleted. Any objections?

Also, why does the name "General articles" have (by country) appended to it? To me it doesn't make any sense, so I'm thinking delete it.--Jamesy0627144 (talk) 07:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All of the articles under "General articles (by country)" are "by country"-related articles (i.e., "Annual cannabis use" links to "Annual cannabis use by country") except for "Timeline of cannabis law". I think it would make more sense to just remove Timeline of cannabis law from "General articles (by country)" and not change anything else. –Surachit (talk) 08:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Surachit, I understand now. I still think a case can be made for combining the two categories, since they are closely related and there is only 5 pages between them. But I went ahead and made the change you suggested and am OK to leave it at that.--Jamesy0627144 (talk) 17:31, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So, I'm ok with this grouping for China, but not Korea. Do we ever consider Korea a singular country on Wikipedia, apart from the WikiProject, and should we be linking to Cannabis in Korea? I think not. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 02:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We do, actually, for things like History of Korea prior to the current partition (or whatever the correct term is), or Culture of Korea, Korean architecture and History of science and technology in Korea for things without respect to political border. ☆ Bri (talk) 06:10, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Korea: User:Onel5969 went ahead and separated them back out, and I put them back in alpha order. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:23, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]