This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This template is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt
This template was considered for deletion on 14 February 2011. The result of the discussion was "keep".
Since it was decided to keep it, i would just put categories for periods instead of few modern conflicts, since it is not possible to include all conflicts since ancient times.Greyshark09 (talk) 21:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sudan and other North African countries do not belong to Middle East (West Asia)
There is some confusion in Western media about this, but Middle East is roughly corresponding West Asia, while North Africa is a separate region. There was an artificial term "Greater Middle East", which tried to integrate North Africa, West Asia and Central Asia, but it has largely fell into disuse in the last decade (it was also very English World-centric, so wasn't in use anywhere else).Greyshark09 (talk) 21:26, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The inclusion of conflict with no pages
I stand against. If they're not notable enough to have articles, what makes them notable enough to be included in this template? Juno (talk) 09:56, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Arab-Israeli wars
Would it not make more sense to include well-known individual wars on the template(6 Day War, Yom Kippur etc) rather than subsuming them under the 'Arab-Israeli conflict' banner WisDom-UK (talk) 23:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have now added the major wars. Not sure why the most famous ME conflicts in the the past few decades were subsumed under 1940s 'Arab-Israeli conflict'. If the principal is that all were basically different episodes in one war, then why do we not similarly subsume the North/South Yemen civil wars into one entry, or the numerous Kurdish uprisings into one entry 'Kurdish rebellion 1910s - present') etc.? Even then, I would dispute that the Arab-Israeli wars were the same when the actors differed (Suez was wholly and Egyptian-Israeli affair, Jordan didn't participate in the Yom Kippur War etc).WisDom-UK (talk) 14:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
::Those are listed under Arab-Israeli conflict wars, which is boldened; as separate events they are famous but rather tiny in comparison with other MidEast wars. If we split every prolonged conflict such as Iran-Iraq War or Lebanese Civil War, it would over-inflate the table.GreyShark (dibra) 07:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]