User talk:Adeletron 3030

Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks!

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Adeletron 3030. You placed an advert tag on the Dana Gluckstein article. Please provide examples of promotion content so I can remediate the situation. Gumballhead1of2 (talk) 09:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gumballhead1of2 Hi, thank you for responding. Overall, I thought the writing came off as promotional, and after a bit of searching, I found that some of your phrasing is directly copied from Gluckstein's promotional material. Needless to say, Wikipedia:Plagiarism should be avoided. My suggestion would be:

• Don't copy phrases or paraphrase closely. Explain things in your own words.
• Avoid long lists, like in the "Notable portrait photographs" section and "...spark meaningful discussions of racism, colonialism, indigeneity, sustainability, stewardship, justice, care, and healing".
• Avoid flowery phrasing like "A pivotal career chapter came in 2010" and "spark meaningful discussions"

I think the issue is that the text is written with the intent to impress and make a point, which is fine if you're writing a marketing blurb for a photographer. A Wikipedia article should be much drier, i.e. "This happened in this year. And then this happened. After that, this happened." Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 17:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you again for your prior comments. I have made some updates, however maybe my lack of perspective has not fully remediated your concerns. I would sincerely appreciate your additional input in resolving the current issue tags.Gumballhead1of2 (talk) 12:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you're being paid to write this article - which is fine! - you should disclose it at Talk:Dana Gluckstein. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 17:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not being paid. Thanks for the input. Your observations are legit. I will take another stab at this.Gumballhead1of2 (talk) 18:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gumballhead1of2 Thanks again for replying here and being receptive. Much appreciated! Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 18:12, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will message the Gluckstein photo uploader requesting additional information.Gumballhead1of2 (talk) 04:21, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Adeletron3030. Has the Dana Gluckstein article been sufficiently cleaned up to remove the tags?Gumballhead1of2 (talk) 13:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gumballhead1of2 Sorry for not responding you sooner. I think the article looks good. I'm still not sure about the paragraph that begins The United States was one of only four votes against UNDRIP when it was originally adopted..." To me, it's too much detail about the impact of the book. Anyway, nominating for Good Article will get you more actionable and detailed feedback that I could hope to. Thanks for your work on this! Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 16:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great idea. I submitted a Good article nomination. Gumballhead1of2 (talk) 11:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jake Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walt Disney Studios.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined your speedy deletion request as it does not meet any of the speedy deletion criteria. I've opted to list if for discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 May 24#File:Lady justice.jpg. -- Whpq (talk) 15:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq Thank you for starting the discussion and letting me know. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 15:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]