User talk:Babysharkboss2

Archives (Index)

2023/July 2023/September 2023/October 2023/November 2023/December 2024/January 2024/February 2024/March 2024/June 2024/September 2024/October

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Please explain your choice to revert my edits at Make America Great Again — am contemplating an undo, but would like to discuss it with you beforehand. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 20:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Babysharkboss2,

If you want to participate in AFD deletion discussion, please give arguments that demonstrate you have studied the article being discussed and carefully reviewed the sources supplied, in the article and in the discussion. Don't just offer an opinion, offer an argument to support your view that is grounded in Wikipedia policy and guidelines. I'm not trying to discourage your participation, I just want you to take it more seriously. AFDs are not for every editor as it requires knowledge and time to contribute productively to the discussion. I know you can do it, just do so thoughtfully. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there...I just tried making changes to my page Brian Hutchison since the edits are out of date and wanted a more updated presence. since you undid my edits can you possibly help me reinstate them since you are clearly more advanced in editing a wikipedia page? I would appreciate it. brian 69.115.238.95 (talk) 20:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Assalam o alaikum. Baby shark boss 2.

You have previously undone my edit in "list of scientists in medical Islamic world". In my edit, I removed the word "astrologers" from the page. Astrologers aren't scientist, they don't do anything scientific. That is why keeping the word in this page is wrong. If astrologers are not considered scientist, then how can we add there name in a page named "list of scientists"? Also, by writing that word in it, you are blaming the other scientists, who weren't astrologers, to be astrologers. I request you that please don't change my edit this time. Astrologers aren't scientists so they can't be added in the list of scientists. Also, you re-added the name of Abu Ma'shar al-Balkhi in the list even when he was prominently an astrologer while all others weren't. I hope you understand.

Also, sorry for bad English I am not Englishman. Hahoo1234 (talk) 08:07, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My preference is that they not be blanked as it adds more steps to reviewing. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:25, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, shit, my bad. Didn't know that. Sorry. Babysharkboss2!! ^{(Viva la Vendetta)} 17:27, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Babysharkboss2,

I'm not sure why but you blanked this orphaned talk page and then tagged it as a CSD G13 speedy deletion even though it wasn't a stale draft. First, please do not blank pages unless there is some objectionable content, like a copyright violation or a BLP violation. And, in those cases, when you tag the page with Twinkle, Twinkle will take care of that. Second, if you want to continue to patrol pages, please review WP:CSD and know the codes thoroughly. There was no way this orphaned talk page (CSD G8) could be mistaken for a stale draft article and since it was recently edited, even if you thought it was a draft page (that for some reason was on a Talk page), it could not be considered stale. Thank you for your contributions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:26, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can you please help in putting correct information in cow dung war top in indian village? Too many hindu people edit it to their Zezo39 (talk) 15:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

?? Babysharkboss2!! ^(Hardwired!) 15:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The people are speceficlly including muslims in the wiki page instead of saying various local communities, including one religon and not naming other is discrimination Zezo39 (talk) 15:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

is it though??? Babysharkboss2!! ^(Hardwired!) 15:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes it is💀 i asked for it to be locked so that it edited by the public anymore, disceimination against religon will not be tolerated Zezo39 (talk) 15:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pidakala War. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. I urge - despite your beliefs - you leave the page alone for now. Administrators will revert it to the correct edition in due course. You'd be wasting your time by continuously fighting the other users. Synorem (talk) 16:04, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, fair. I'll back off. I apologize. Babysharkboss2!! ^(Hardwired!) 16:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, could you please elaborate on what exactly you think is unsourced here? The template clearly leads to the official page of the BVMI and states that the single "Master of Puppets" was certified gold. Pretty straightforward. Lk95 (talk) 16:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Had dodgey internet, just checked it. Sorry. You can revert if you want, or i'll self-reverse. Sorry. Babysharkboss2!! ^(Hardwired!) 16:47, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Republican Party efforts to disrupt the 2024 United States presidential election#Removal of baseless in allegations of non citizens voting I believe you accidentally reverted my message I reverted you cause I believe it was a mistake as i was using the talk page as intended •Cyberwolf•talk? 15:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I actually came to this talk page to reach out about that that revert. There was not a legitimate reason to remove the comment on the talk page @Babysharkboss2, please do not do so in the future unless it's clearly intentionally disruptive or vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:44, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I’m guessing you may have seen my request at the Teahouse? I was absolutely going to come back to edit the page, but I was holding off specifically so that the content wouldn’t be removed with no reason at all. I think it’s important to have appropriate reasoning for edits to prevent confused newbies or potential edit wars, so I was very much trying to find the right policy to point to.

If you hadn’t seen it and you simply stumbled onto the page like I did, then by all means please ignore me! But if you had, I’m not too sure of your logic for sniping the edit like that with no reasoning. It isn’t a race!

All the best, Geesi (talk) 16:59, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stoobid blonde rainbow 176.45.144.28 (talk) 17:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What? Babysharkboss2!! ^(XXX) 17:39, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L babysharkboss2 W me 176.45.144.28 (talk) 17:40, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok...sure. Babysharkboss2!! ^(XXX) 17:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i agree with the ip lol rare ip W 188.50.151.19 (talk) 12:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WE ARE THE MZEFSR (Personal attack removed) W HarushigaSuckerOnWiki (talk) 14:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What? Babysharkboss2!! ^(XXX) 14:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This closure was unhelpful, especially since it only gave me exactly 30 minutes in which to respond. Please don't close threads on AN/I (or elsewhere) unless you are 100% sure that the discussion is over. 2A00:23C5:50E8:EE01:4493:E642:C10F:CD4A (talk) 18:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, how are you? I noticed you reverted my edit on the Associated Press article. Can you please explain the reason for the revert? PotatoKugel (talk) 04:42, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you said that it was NPOV. I was referencing an AllSides article that said the AP has a left bias. How could this possibly be presented neutrally? PotatoKugel (talk) 05:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it necessary? ☩ ^{(Babysharkboss2)} 13:08, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The political bias of a major news agency isn't important? Especially if it changed recently?

Here is a quote from that AllSides article:

"The Associated Press has historically been considered the "gold standard" of objective journalism. It operates a wire service, meaning local and national news organizations around the country use AP's content to fill gaps in their coverage. That means AP news content has extremely wide impact and reach.

As such, AllSides does particularly extensive analysis of AP. When AP displays political bias, or fails to portray political events, legislation, and perspectives in a balanced and even-handed way, the impact is broad and far-reaching. A media outlet that is relied upon by outlets all over the country deserves a high level of scrutiny when it comes to political bias."

AllSides certainly seems to think it is important to give a judgement on AP's political bias PotatoKugel (talk) 13:16, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We don't call CNN far-left. Becuase its a controversial thought. Calling OANN far-right isn't controversial. If you want to include political bias, your gonna need more then one source. ☩ ^{(Babysharkboss2)} 13:51, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can we continue this discussion on the AP News talk page? PotatoKugel (talk) 14:35, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey can we continue this discussion on the AP News talk page? PotatoKugel (talk) 06:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I noticed your summary on User talk:Pembroke Lakes Schools was a little, vulgar. We should probably try to stay civil. Thanks! Gaismagorm (talk) 16:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pembroke_Lakes_Schools&diff=prev&oldid=1261528657 this one specifically. Gaismagorm (talk) 16:08, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me for asking, but why be civil when some corporate pawn posts unsubstantiated claims and breaks every rule on the website? ApteryxRainWing🐉 | Roar with me!!! | My contributions 18:37, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ApteryxRainWing Edit summaries are open to everyone, not just the disruptor. Saying "Fuck Florida" doesn't make Wikipedia a more "pleasant editing environment" (WP:CIVILITY) in my eyes at least. TheWikiToby (talk) 18:56, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh yeah I forgot about that. My bad. ApteryxRainWing🐉 | Roar with me!!! | My contributions 18:58, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Babysharkboss2 Came here to post a similar message. Thanks for helping to revert the vandalism at bbno$, but this edit summary was completely uncivil (even if vandals probably deserve that kind of language) LaffyTaffer (talk) 21:10, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added the Controversy section, which exposes the questionable behavior of the company in not issuing a purchase invoice.

This affects people and/or companies that pay for the additional features.

Don't you think it's important that a company is harming the people who trust it?

Angelvg (talk) 16:07, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't add good sources. Worded it poorly. Wikipedia isn't a warning. ☩ ^{(Babysharkboss2)} 16:09, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, can you please added it?

I think it is important to report this behavior, not just the information about what the software does.

Regarding the sources, I am the source, in the company where I work we have this same problem, I have sent the emails with the screenshots and they do not issue the invoice. If you need proof, I can send it to you, but it would not be for publication since they have information from the client who asked us to buy the service with them.

Since I can't post screenshots of the purchase (because have private information from a customer), I used links to reddit where several users reported the same problem.

I can send screenshots of the purchase and copies of the emails where we requested the invoice, but they cannot be published for everyone because they contain private information.

Any idea? Angelvg (talk) 17:52, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. We require WP:Reliable sources to publish nearly anything. Especially something such as a criticism section. Reddit is not a reliable source. ☩ ^{(Babysharkboss2)} 18:09, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pinewood Preparatory School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia College. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Babysharkboss2,

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

If I see correctly, you had restored a birth date removed "for privacy" reasons in the article about Nancy Torresen without providing a citation. Are you sure that the information has been widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object to the details being made public as required by WP:BLPPRIVACY, and would you mind citing the source you used when restoring the material?

Thank you very much in advance and best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm kind of curious now that you've thanked several of my edits on the most random places such as my talk page. Do you just check my contribs page often or am I on your watchlist or something? ApteryxRainWing🐉 | Roar with me!!! | My contributions 17:24, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just monitor Recent Changes, lol. ☩ ^{(Babysharkboss2)} 17:24, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that makes sense. Given how often the encyclopedia is edited, I'm surprised you've caught me multiple times (although maybe it isn't hard to find me when I flood the contribs log with welcome messages on newbies' talk pages.) ApteryxRainWing🐉 | Roar with me!!! | My contributions 17:27, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You added redundant text, which I had copy edited. Why do you feel the same information should be in the sentence twice? Extra Jesus Hold The Satan!! (talk) 02:36, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Removing another editor's post on my talk page. It wasn't clear vandalism, and it was not your user talk page, so no touchy!  ${\displaystyle Jayhawker6}$【💬】 12:09, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	Reparations
	Couldn't figure out why my signature wouldn't set to Comic Sans a couple days ago, so I looked at one of your old signature's source code and figured it out. Thanks for the great indirect help. Here's a quarter to pay off the debt I owe you. Cya! Tarlby (t) (c) 06:44, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

because you say slap me with the fish and I kinda want to ngl Sandyistheslay (talk) 00:15, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello mr Babysharkboss2.Why did you deleted my edits on dosojin page???What did I did wrong??? 2A02:587:8D00:B300:6DA5:67CE:C639:C939 (talk) 18:13, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Babysharkboss2, I saw your CSD tags on Talk:YBA Live. Just a friendly reminder that although your G8 tagging is correct, this is a talkpage so A7 doesn't apply. Thanks for your work in this area! UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 16:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]