User talk:Big Ayeh

Hi Big Ayeh! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Big Ayeh (talk) 13:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Click this button
to review
an AfC submission

Wikipedia ads	file info – #69

Hi Big Ayeh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, I am grateful. Big Ayeh (talk) 08:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Nana Kwasi Aryeh. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 21:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Nana Yaw Ayeh. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 21:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Praxidicae was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

CUPIDICAE💕 11:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Big Ayeh. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Big Ayeh. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Big Ayeh|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. CUPIDICAE💕 14:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No please,I don't think I am doing conflict of interest or Paid; but i believe the artist in question (Paa Kwasi) is a recognized Ghanaian musician who deserves a shot on wikipedia's platform if only we've been able to provide credible sources. Thank you. Big Ayeh (talk) 15:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, social websites are not acceptable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nana Yaw Ayeh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Nana Yaw Ayeh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 12:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Takoradi Senior High School and Ofori Amponsah. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:32, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am much grateful, thanks for your advice 🙏🏿 Big Ayeh (talk) 13:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Nana Yaw Ayeh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 20:08, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Nana Yaw Ayeh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 21:56, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Big Ayeh, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Big Aryeh Gh (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 20:26, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Wisdom Cudjoe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:56, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Scope creep was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Submission has already been rejected.

scope_creep^Talk 14:58, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dobble (Musician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 20:14, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Big Ayeh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nana Yaw Ayeh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Curbon7 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Curbon7 (talk) 20:34, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Please do not resubmit after rejection.

Eternal Shadow Talk 16:14, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:MUSICBIO

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paa Kwasi (Singer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paa Kwasi (Singer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:19, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JavaHurricane were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paa Kwasi Dobble and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paa Kwasi Dobble, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JavaHurricane 07:04, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Paa Kwasi Dobble, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Big Ayeh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nana Kwasi Aryeh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paa Kwasi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paa Kwasi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Living love ^talk 17:33, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Big Ayeh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nana Yaw Ayeh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Paa Kwasi (Musician). Thanks! Xclusivzik (talk) 17:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Dobble (music duo). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I still don't see how he is independently notable from the Dobble group

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paa Kwasi Dobbel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paa Kwasi Dobbel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you.

Hello, Big Ayeh. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Based on the contact information you posted, you appear to be one of the two members in Dobble (music duo) so I am tagging that article for autobiography. If you wish to make changes to that article, please make {{edit request}} on the talk page from here on. Same with Draft:Paa Kwasi. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:49, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xclusivzik was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paa Kwasi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paa Kwasi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Xclusivzik (talk) 09:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Princess of Ara was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Sourced to interviews and routine coverage. No evidence that the general notability guideline or the guideline for musicians is met.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kumi Guitar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kumi Guitar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Princess of Ara 10:24, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No indication of independent notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paa Kwasi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paa Kwasi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 14:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also don't know why you guy's keep decline this article, and the comments that the subject is not notable is disquieting. Big Ayeh (talk) 18:14, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kumi Guitar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kumi Guitar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 15:52, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! — {{u|Bsoyka}} ^talk 19:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bsoyka was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Zero new references since the last decline, and only one added since the first decline. Big Ayeh, you absolutely must add more references to show the subject's notability if you actually want this draft to be considered. Otherwise, the result will not change and your draft will likely be rejected without an option to resubmit it again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kumi Guitar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kumi Guitar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— {{u|Bsoyka}} ^talk 19:52, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (It was mistake) --Big Ayeh (talk) 22:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Dobble (music duo). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This still has no independent notability from the former group and could be summarized in an Aftermath section on that page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paa Kwasi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paa Kwasi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:47, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Kumi Guitar may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Big Ayeh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 154.160.16.114. Can someone help me understand this?. Big Ayeh (talk) 11:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; as there is no block on your account, I can't unblock it.

Yes, the IP range is blocked. And not only as a proxy, it's blocked globally, across all Wikimedia projects, meaning I don't have the authority to modify it, much less lift it.

But there are other options. First, and this might work temporarily, editing from other devices that might be off the range. Second, I would definitely go to WP:IPECPROXY and follow the instructions there to request IP block exemption. You seem to have been editing for a while, and have a good track record (no blocks), so I think you might very well get it. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Big Ayeh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Decline reason:

We cannot consider a blank request, please follow the instructions provided above. 331dot (talk) 14:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think I have to delete my account and data from Wikipedia since they decide not to allow me to edit, I had been blocked almost every day why? the reason they gave is am operating on VPN/Proxy which is not.

I was blocked last month and I freed this week, as I try to edit they blocked me again and told me it will expire on July 26.

Any help? Big Ayeh (talk) 07:39, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your account is not blocked and you should follow the above comments by Daniel Case. 0xDeadbeef 03:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Draft:Paa Kwasi. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. 0xDeadbeef 03:51, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@0xDeadbeef I am not the same person, the person in question is a musical artist from Wast Africa, Ghana.

And the name "Ayeh" which makes you think I'm the person is the surname of an ethnic group called [[1]] from the Eastern Part of Ghana.

And to me I think he deserves an acknowledgement on Wikipedia's platform that why I decide to write about him. Big Ayeh (talk) 09:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that you are getting paid to write articles or have a personal connection with Paa Kwasi. You must declare it according to our conflict of interest policy. 0xDeadbeef 10:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@0xDeadbeef I am an entertainment personal and also into blogging, therefore I find it interested to write or do publication about Ghanaian celebrities, and I have a lot of articles which I am working on to publish on this platform, I don't get paid on publication and as we all know that blogging is a passion, that's why I took it upon myself to write about people which I think they deserve to be known globally. Big Ayeh (talk) 10:13, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The case of Paa Kwasi is that you have proved that you own the permissions to their photograph through an email. You can't both claim to have copyright of the person's photograph and then to claim that you are independent of them. 0xDeadbeef 10:15, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@0xDeadbeef yes I said that because I know there's no copyright infringement on that photograph, and in Ghana, a lot of the images that they post online don't have copyright infringement and since I'm doing publication on him I needed to use that particular photo so I said so for it to be accepted. Big Ayeh (talk) 10:29, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is a factually incorrect analysis of copyright law and wikipedia's policies. Images are by default usually not free unless they are very old or unless the actual creator explicitly states that they are free (see commons:Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Ghana, where we learn that even truely anonymous works are protected for 70 years from their original publication). Deadbeef is correct that there appears to be a contradiction in your statements of actually making promotional-style/posed photos of someone and having no connection to them.

At [2] you state that the KofiAyehJr twitter account is yours, and in other enwiki edits you stated a connection to Bigayehmedia. This wiki account also appears to be related to the User:Big Aryeh Gh account, and "Aryeh" matches the real name of Paa Kwasi. Taken together, that seems pretty strong evidence that you are not a fully independent editor here. So it's time to come clean: are you actually involved in any way with the businesses that promote or produce any of the bands or individuals? Or are you not being honest about your relationship to the companies and their intellectual property? I can't really think of any other logical explanations here. DMacks (talk) 08:35, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Missvain was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Hi.

I'm sorry, but none of the sourcing here helps the subject meet our general notability guidelines nor WP:NORG at this point. All of the sources presented just mention Paa Kwasi in passing. If he’s such a big award winning artist, for example, there would be major features about him.

We need *significant* coverage in notable media outlets or by notable publishers. Examples: magazine and newspaper reviews and features about Paa Kwasi specifically; books written ABOUT Paa Kwasi; television and radio features ABOUT Paa Kwasi.

If those are available, please improve this submission. If not, then it appears to be WP:TOOSOON for Paa Kwasi to have their own Wikipedia article.

I hope you will consider improving existing Wikipedia content about other subjects of interest!

If you have any questions please ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 19:44, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is User:Big Ayeh. Thank you. 0xDeadbeef 02:21, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@0xDeadbeef I am an entertainment person who loves to write on blogs and am not affiliated with any of the articles I have published here, the persons I wrote about them are well-known celebrities whose news is visible out there.

You mentioned that I have some of the artist's content on my YouTube channel which is true but they are not the only artist I published their works on my channel if you watch carefully you will notice that I posted a lot of other musicians' content too.

You were talking about me being a "conflict of interest" but my question is "if you don't have interest in something how can you write about it"? and I published this article of a member of Parliament (MP) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Wisdom_Cudjoe?wprov=sfla1 and worked with so many articles well you call that one too conflict of interest? Yaw19784Big Ayeh (talk) 12:02, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

• Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Beeblebrox Can you help by deleting my "Data" from Wikipedia's database? I am not interested edit on this platform anymore since am not getting paid but you guys keep blocking and accusing me of being a conflict of interest. I want to ask you a question, don't you have an interest in the pages and articles you created? Yaw19784Big Ayeh (talk) 17:31, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's a difference between being interested in a subject and having a direct connection with a subject, as you appear to have. You inability or unwillingness to acknowledge that doesn't change anything. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Beeblebrox I have no affiliations with the articles I created and haven't received anything whether compensation or encouragement from any of them, I am just an entertainment journalist whose trying to write about the recognised musicians and movie stars around my region, and I don't know why the name "Aryeh" has been so difficult for you guys because the writer and the subject share the same name. Yaw19784Big Ayeh (talk) 17:51, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps then you'd care to explain the following. The subjects you edit about are also artists promoted on:

• the website https://bigayehmedia.com/, and
• this Facebook account, described as "BIGAYEHMEDIA is a Media Company Specializes In Web Publishing, Social Media Marketing, Digital Music & Video Distribution, Online Advertising & Branding", and
• this Soundcloud account, described as "Distributor||Writer||Blogger||Promoter"), and
• this Twitter account, described as "Administrator @bigayehmedia (No1 Entertainment Website) Promoter and Publicist at @paakwasi_9" ... paakwasi_9 is the Twitter handle of Paa Kwasi, an artist you've written about.

The preponderance of evidence contradicts your previous explanations. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:36, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@Drm310 When you visit the website you just shared which is my company, you will see that I write about a lot of artists that is why I mentioned that I am an entertainment journalist and if the person or subject I write about has all the references that make him qualify for Wikipedia's article what my affiliation got to do with the writeup? Yaw19784Big Ayeh (talk) 21:11, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We have explained why that is a problem multiple times and you never understood what we were trying to communicate to you. It occurs to me that you don't understand the term "conflict of interest" fully. 0xDeadbeef 04:17, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Beeblebrox I don't want any back and forth, therefore, I want my account to be deleted.🙏🏿 Yaw19784Big Ayeh (talk) 17:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts cannot be deleted. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:26, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And now two rather obvious sock accounts have been blocked, so that's a third thing that would need to be addressed in any unblock appeal. This is odd behavior from someone who just two days ago was insistent they did not want to contribute here anymore, and at this point the standard offer, followed by an appeal that clearly and honestly addresses all these points is probably your best route to an unblock. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:05, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Beeblebrox I am not bothered though, I've been here getting to 6 years and me being here is voluntary, however, editing and publishing on blogs is my passion, therefore, sizing my access want stops me from doing what I love. Yaw19784Big Ayeh (talk) 16:44, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Posting comments like this waste other people's time. Do not reply further before an appeal or you might get your talk page access revoked. 0xDeadbeef 16:47, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Beeblebrox not just talk page along I want my account to be deleted from the saver then I will be happy. Yaw19784Big Ayeh (talk) 16:51, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It has already been clearly explained to you that this is simply not possible. If you don't want to contribute anymore, it really could not be simpler, just stop editing. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:03, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drm310 you guys are funny,😄 do you think it bothered me? no! those accounts were created long ago before creating 👉🏿 User:Big Ayeh, all I want is to help delete my account from the savers because am tired of the feeds in my email. Yaw19784Big Ayeh (talk) 17:08, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt out of emails in your preferences but your account cannot and will not be deleted. Your talk page access, however is likely to be revoked. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:09, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Am into coding and I know my data can be deleted from the savers so don't sit there and lied to yourself. Yaw19784Big Ayeh (talk) 17:12, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We cannot delete accounts as explained by WP:DELETEACC. this has nothing to do with the technical ability of deleting an account. 0xDeadbeef 17:15, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Beeblebrox (talk) 17:16, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Big Ayeh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paa Kwasi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Big Ayeh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paa Kwasi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:28, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, I am writing to ask for forgiveness and plead for my actions. I was blocked indefinitely on July 10, 2022, by @Beeblebrox for what he called "Promotional Username, Promotional edits." Later, he also revoked my access to my talk page, citing reasons such as sockpuppetry, inappropriate use of the talk page while being blocked, and wasting time in general.

I understand that my behavior was not acceptable and that it violated the rules and policies of the platform. I apologize for any inconvenience I may have caused to the moderators and community members. I understand the importance of maintaining a positive and constructive environment on the platform, and I will do my best to abide by the rules in the future.

I hope that my sincere apology and acknowledgment of my mistakes will be taken into consideration, and I will be given another chance to contribute to the platform in a positive manner. Thank you for your time. Yaw19784Big Ayeh (talk) 16:38, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The wording makes me suspect the use of an AI to generate this comment. To be unblocked you need to show an understanding of how our policies work, and using AI tools don't help show that. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 17:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@0xDeadbeef I wasn't using an AI, or whatever you call it; my return to Wikipedia implies that I regret my actions and behavior against some of the moderators here during the time I was barred, and I am now here to apologize to them.

And I have read and comprehended the terms of utilizing this site, which is why I returned to beg pardon. Yaw19784Big Ayeh (talk) 17:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]