I really appreciate it. You are probably wondering why I ask. Well, I have spent my weekend on a graph found here: User:Inclusionist/AfD on average day. I am interested in what type of user gets their page deleted, etc....November 15 is just a day pulled out of a hat by another user today.
Thank you fellow inclusionist (your user page lists you as a inclusionist).
Thanks for the help on this article (place of birth location). For some reason your edit summary made me laugh (no Russia back then)! Cheers. Lugnuts (talk) 07:51, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hope to see you around again soon, I would join the Ukranian project,
but as I do not have any experience of Ukraine or Ukrainian, I thought it best that i don't
To learn more about project Ukraine click on the advert below, we could really need some wikipedians who write about Ukrainian Geological beauty by the way! So thanks for doing that! — Mariah-Yulia (talk) 18:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, but it seems like the discussion was about if it should be capital R or not in Raion. Not if it should be Pohrebyschenskyi Raion or Pohrebysche Raion for example. He has just moved the pages, but you can imagine how many articles that needs to be changed if we should stick with the new format. Närking (talk) 18:43, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron
Privet Dima!
Hello, DDima. Based on the templates on your talk page, please consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. You can join >> here <<.
Do you know the height of the building, and a few more dates to include in the infobox. We are nominating it to FA in the Spanish wikipedia. Thanks for your collaboration! Please see also the talk page. Cheers OboeCrack (talk) 16:18, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I don't really know its' height. I'll look around and tell you if I find it. For the dates, you could probably include since when is it used as a presidential residence (2005).. Nice job on it btw, too bad I can't read any Spanish. Cheers, ddima.talk03:47, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello
Hi, Dima! I'm Cally Berry, an Argentinian user. Can I please ask you a favor, please? I traslated your article, House with Chimaeras to Spansih and I'm trying to make it a featured article in the Spanish Wikipedia. I know that you can speak Ukranian, I don't, so have you got some information about the reconstruction of the building? Can you traslate it to Spanish, if you can? Thank you very much. Please be patient with me and forgive my horrible orthography. Thank you, --Cally Berry (talk) 22:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)PD: Can you please answer me in my Spanish talk page?[reply]
I really think that the Ukrainian wiki articles would really benefit from input from Ukrainians. I mean (of course) from Ukrainian citizens who live in Ukraine. The input from Canadian-Ukrainians and USA-Ukrainians is of course appreciated but also a bit second hand information. Ukrainian Ukrainians (might) have a better insight in what's going on (I really enjoined Vasyl` Babych inputs for example!). Would it be a good idea to make an help wanted advert/announcement on the Ukrainian Wikipedia? Something like: Help give the world a complete picture and improve your English! join English wikipedia!. After all those are the reasons I'm not editing on the Dutch wikipedia but I'm editing this one! I also have the idea Vasyl` Babych Englis has improved :) — Mariah-Yulia (talk) 09:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But Ukrainian Ukrainians mostly works in Ukrainian Wikipedia. And Ukrainians from diaspora mostly edit here (why? why they do not edit uk-wiki).--Anatoliy (Talk) 21:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There are a couple of reasons. For me, I just came here to the English Wikipedia accidentally and found out that there is (or wasn't) any good articles relating to Ukraine. I sort of started to pitch in with the collaboration. Another, my Ukrainian isn't very well to write any articles in the uk-wiki so I can only contribute stub-wise. Others might not agree from the political standpoint of the uk-wiki (just as similarly with the ru-wiki). It all depends. ddima.talk04:14, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A problem is that Ukrainian nationalists come from other countries, tend to have a political POV, that is not widely shared in the Blue parts of the country. This even applies to spellings of cities, which they insist must be done their way based on the spelling used in the Arizona Sun, etc. It is annoying, but if people who actually live in Ukraine make changes, they tend not be registered users and are quickly reverted, and so never develop into regular editors.--Toddy1 (talk) 15:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All the Canadian/US Ukrainian editors here are more nationalistic then editors from Lviv you mean? I (sometimes) have that idea too.... For sure there all Orange. — Mariah-Yulia (talk) 15:10, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking more of Donetsk, Dnepropetrovsk, and Kharkov - I have only met one person who told me he supported orange parties. People I have talked to about politics generally vote conservative.--Toddy1 (talk) 18:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A. Bakharev blocked this guy a few weeks ago, but he is now on vacation and the guy is back. This has been added multiple times by a single anonymous IP: [2]. The IP has been up to similar mischief on other articles such as here: [3]. Should it get blocked?Faustian (talk) 21:05, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't agree. I think he/she is a bit nationalistic editor with a poor grasp of English. If we approach him/her friendly and with respect she/he could be a good additional member. I have seen this before with UkraineToday and M.V.E.i.. He/she has already asked how to make his information more NPOV. Just blocking people who don't act as experienced wikipedians looks a bit lame... (I made some rooky fouls also...) — Mariah-Yulia (talk) 22:39, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
He keeps adding this to the article: "But Ukraine will soon finally join the Western world and NATO[1]. Russians will pay dearly for their terrible genocidal atrocities and anti-Western anti-Ukrainian crimes. Russia will soon fall apart an cease to exist as a county. Eastern part will be absorbed by the USA, Japan and China. Western part will be divided between Ukraine and Poland. Russians will work as slaves and prostitutes." This is much more than a rookie mistake, and he's already been blocked for the same behavior.Faustian (talk) 03:52, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Anatoly Alexandrov
I noticed you were a recent editor of the Alexandrov article, so I wonder if you could provide your opinion about the use of title "judge of peace." Do you think "justice of the peace" is intended or was there such a title at one time? I'm thinking it should be changed. Thanks for any response.Aliotra (talk) 21:15, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I work with the Grant Park Music Festival and we are publishing a history/coffee table book titled SOUNDS OF CHICAGO'S LAKEFRONT: A CELEBRATION OF THE GRANT PARK MUSIC FESTIVAL. The first chapter is a detailed historic essay from Park Historian Julia Bachrach about the evolution of Grant Park and then the books goes by decade with hundreds of photographs including never before published photographs.
We would love to use your image within the opening spread of color photographs, so it would be great exposure for you and your work! Please contact me as soon as you can regarding this, by the end of the week we need to have all photographs finalized. If you would allow us to use this image, I ask if you could send to me a high resolution formatted image.
I created an article about Ivan Kyrylenko, so I found out that during the Orange Revolution he was a member of the cabinet of Viktor Yanukovych!! How did he became from being pro-Yanukovych (if he was so???) to a important member of BYuT??? I tried to look for it on the internet (also in Ukrainian) but I can't find it... What was his role in the Orange Revolution? Watching it on TV??? I'm asking you cause your Ukrainian is better then mine and you seem to be interested in Ukrainian politics. — Mariah-Yulia (talk) 22:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Found it out already (sort of), except what his feelings where for the Orange Revolution... Would be interesting if BYuT had an anti-orange faction leader... You're welcome to check the articel out of course :) — Mariah-Yulia (talk) 12:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
page move
Heu Dima, I don't know if you remember doing this Talk:FC_Chornomorets_Odessa#Requested_move. The survey obviously favored moving to Odesa because of the evidence you brought forth. The user who closed it cited "Dynamo Kiev" as a reason for not moving to Odesa. But now that page was moved to Kyiv. Could you start another move discussion or just move it yourself? Thanks, Ostap04:43, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have reviewed Andriyivskyy Descent for GA Sweeps to determine if it still qualifies as a Good Article. In reviewing the article I have found several issues, which I have detailed here. Since you are a main contributor of the article (determined based on this tool), I figured you would be interested in contributing to further improve the article. Please comment there to help the article maintain its GA status. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:55, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Are you able to address the remaining issue? If not, I can delist the article for now and then re-review it whenever you find sources for the sections. If you have any questions, let me know. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:43, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, sorry about taking too long. I have just added more references to the History, Mikhail Bulgakov House, and Monuments sections. I also added the citations to the One Street Museum section right from the museum's official site. I hope this will be enough to satisfy the RS for the text. ddima.talk05:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please take a look at this article. It has a big problem and I don't know what to do. Should stuff get removed? Thanks, Ostap05:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I saw that. That's what happens when anons come and copy paste stuff into our articles. Might actually be a copyvio. A lot of it is useless information anyway that wouldn't be in normal city articles. Let's start the cleanup ddima.talk20:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I just saw that yesterday just didn't have any time to seriously look into it (soon). P.S. we need a new Ukrainian Wiki collaboration, say for DYK??? What do you think we need to work on? I haven't wrote anything in a while and no new DYK's came out from the Ukraine section of Wiki... ddima.talk05:43, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The territory of Ukraine was enlarged westward not after the WWII, but right before it when Soviet Union and Germany started the war with the invasion of Poland. Check your facts! The border changes took place in 1920's also when Taganrog was transferred to the Russian SFSR. On the territory of Ukraine was created pro-Russian government of invented Moldavian autonomous republic which in 1990s concluded in a major military conflict. Now the only right thing in the article is the fact about the transfer of the Crimea in 1954. That leades me to some suspicion that maybe the visit card of the article was written by someone who needs some polishing off on the history of Ukraine. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 21:44, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
In the introduction, we are shortly discussing the article about Ukraine, including major changes to the country (addition of a third of the country) and not just the transferal of Taganrog area. However, while the western Ukrainian lands were transferred to Soviet Ukraine after the 1939 invasion, they were "officially" annexed and adopted to the Ukrainian SSR in 1945. ddima.talk 00:44, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Say, what??? Of course, the whole administrative reforms had to take place, which does not take a week, plus in 1939 Soviets did not really have a time while they were terrorizing the local population. But the territories were officially under the jurisdiction of unrecognized Ukrainian SSR. Adoptation, yes! did happen in 1945, but annexation of western Ukraine, Bucovina, and other territories took place in 1939 which was the great increase in the territory. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 02:07, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
New edition
Dima, I did another edit on the article Portal:Ukraine. I added Ласкаво просимо до Порталу, Україна. What are your thoughts? I think it will add some flavor to the page and warmth to the Ukrainians that will find the page. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 02:25, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I agree. That is alot nicer and will greet fellow users. Let's try and keep updating the whole portal as it is a Featured Portal and should be kept that way. ddima.talk05:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Template:WikiProject Metros in FSU requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks for moving the Jeziory (Ukraine) article to its Ukrainian name. I didn't know how the Cyrillic would be transliterated into English so that's why I created it under the Polish name. -Krasnoludek (talk) 07:41, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Шановний Дмитре!
Скажіть будь ласка, що Вам не подобається в останньому редагуванні? Я ж бо начебто знаю правила транслітерації з української (не російської) на англійську. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pashko 2 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for not using Ukrainian, unfortunately, I am not comfortable in commanding the language, but on your user page I saw that you understand English quite easily..
I reverted your edits because according to Wikipedia Naming Conventions, on the English Wikipedia we use the most commonly used English variant for place names. This is a long standing debate which has gone on for years in the Wiki-community, however the current consensus is that we use the name Russian transliterated version Kiev instead of the Ukrainian transliteration of Kyiv. Ukrainian being the only official language in Ukraine, thus Київ being written as Kyiv does not affect our usage on the English Wikipedia. The same can be said of the article on Sergey Korolyov. Such is the most commonly used English language variant (indicated by Google hits and major news publications, etc.)
Please take a look on the talk page for the Kiev naming issue. If you disagree, propose any changes to the way we write the name of the Ukrainian capital there. Anyway, plainly changing Kiev to Kyiv (and vice versa for others) is not helpful and only distracts us from our purpose of writing free quality articles. There are special naming conventions for transliterating peoples names, etc. and why we use whichever names we use for the articles in question.. Please take a look at the specifics there.
Sorry but nothing is this easy on Wikipedia :) I suggest to not start with this whole issue and rather help improve and write articles relating to Ukraine. When I first started on here, I too thought of changing every instance of Kyiv to Kiev, yet my viewpoint changed.. Wikipedia just uses the common name used in the English language, just like Moscow is for Moskva. I seriously doubt that we will ever see the article on Moscow be moved to Moskva. It just isn't what is established in the English language..
And (unfortunatly for some of us, the article on K**v stays at Kiev and not Kyiv. Proposing a move also won't help the situation (we've had NUMEROUS amounts of them and they have all failed) Like I said before, Wikipedia runs on consensus, and the Wikicommunity has agreed upon the current situation of using commonly established English place names for our articles. --ddima.talk18:39, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just a little question about the List_of_raions_in_Ukraine_by_subdivision - you worked on the article when it was pretty new - can you tell me if those redlinks were articles that have been deleted or if they were never actually created ?
DDima, there is a fairly steady level of IP vandalism at several articles that deal with cities of Ukraine. You have seen this today. It manifests as removing Russian alternate names for Dnipropetrovsk, Kharkiv, Rivne, Mykolaiv, etc. Since you are an admin, would you be willing to put semi-protection on these articles? At least once or twice a week I have to revert these articles after an IP has vandalized them. Thanks for your consideration. (Taivo (talk) 06:15, 10 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]
unr
sure thing. it just seemed whatever consensus there was on the talk page was dated and WP:OR at best, so I just ran with it.--Львівське (talk) 16:41, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image rights for Chimera house
Hi DDima, I'm an editor with the Wall Street Journal and we would like to use your pictures of the Chimera house in an online slideshow. Just checking to make sure we can use them as long as we correctly attribute them. Please advise.
Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyanwsj (talk • contribs) 16:57, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Cyanwsj!
Yes you can use the photos for the Chimera house, it would be great to have them published there. Just attribute them to "Dmytro Sergiyenko" and everything shall be fine. Thanks, --ddima.talk02:32, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have made a major edit of the NTU KhPI page to improve what I could, could I ask you to look at it and remove the copyedit and wikify tags if you see it appropriate? I feel I have no rights to do it as I did not add them. --Vs1969 (talk) 15:01, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hope all is ok with you
HI m8
Hoping all is well with you as it seems you are away a long time and only on now and then
I need some advice and thought of you first; I'll approach others like Taivo if you cannot help though so don't worry :¬)
I have been updating the portal page as it seems no-one else is and I know you did a lot of work on pages like Portal talk:Ukraine/Did you know
What is the best way to find articles on the FA, A class and GA candidates lists - They seem to not be categorised too much and I wondered if theres an easy way to get info out on whether the pages there are in the Ukrainian cats?
I would like to know if there is a way to easily do that on the DYK if you have any info ....
Thanks for checking in..! Yeah, everything is good, I know I haven't been too active lately :/ maybe a collaboration soon, need to find a good topic to write about! Also, thanks for keeping the portal in line, I have been away way too long, gotta keep up the pace soon :)
"What is the best way to find articles on the FA, A class and GA candidates lists - They seem to not be categorised too much and I wondered..."
Did you mean specifically for the Ukrainian WikiProject, as in which articles relating to the UA WikiProject were candidates for FA and GA but failed the nominations, etc? If so, then there's no way that they are categorized.. Could be useful in the future to know which ones failed so we can expand and improve upon them.. --ddima.talk06:38, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Making a category is no problem, but I cannot find out how to link them into the "tree"
I just updated the project summary and took them out manually for now - with only 20 or so its not a problem. (you can see that I added "NP" for those newly promoted and "PR"). For articles in B class and below automating it with cats would be much better as there would be 3,000 of them lol.
The other issues are mainly related to maintenance. As ther arent that many people around (just Taivo, Maria Yulliah and myself really) keeping thngs on the portal like DYK etc may not be so easy.
Hey. I would like to add a music sample (or more) to the article on Mykola Leontovych as you suggested, but I'm not sure how that is done. So far as I know, adding youtube links is not accepted on wikipedia. I also tried to link the samples from the article on uk wiki to here but they turn out red. Do you have to re-upload them to the eng lang wiki, or is there a way around this? --BoguslavM17:41, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I believe you have to re-upload them on to the en-wiki.. unless they are uploaded on the Wikimedia Commons.. but the people over on the Commons are pretty strict with copyright standards, but it should be public domain anyways, right? Anyway, I've personally never uploaded files on wiki, there is a guide right here on how to do it.. there should be some kinds of music files that Wikipedia supports, I believe its the .ogg files, but I don't know how to save them under that file format.. Let's hope it works! --ddima.talk18:58, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it's listed under WP:NFCC on the uk wiki but no rationale is offered on the page of the sound, so I'm not even sure if it is used legally there :(--BoguslavM20:54, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, uk-wiki doesn't help with that prospect.. they rarely even follow copyright rules there, so don't be surprised they might have just thrown on a copyright tag to not bother with it.. Anywhere online where we can find the files? I don't have time to search right now, but I think it may be qualified under public domain since it's a musical piece and not something like say a sample of a Beatles song (which would definitely be copyrighted) We can ask on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions to see what they would suggest doing with it otherwise have the copyright people hassling us about it lol! --ddima.talk21:49, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Afternoon! I've finished the review of Kamianets-Podilskyi Castle; have a look and see how you'd like me to play the copy-editing issue in particular. Hchc2009 (talk) 17:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reviewing the page, putting it on GAC was on my to do list for a long time..! I'll definitely be working on this page for the next couple of days.. Let's continue on the review page.. --ddima/talk18:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
обращаюсь к вам с просьбой дать совет по разрешению конфликтной ситуации между мной и группой пользователей во главе с Lvivske в англоязычной статье http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rinat_Akhmetov. Мною, а также другими пользователями были удалены разделы о предположительных связях данного человека с криминальным миром, так как были использованы ссылки на недостоверные источники, эмоционально окрашенные негативные высказывания о личности этого живущего человека, который является публичной персоной, которые также не были подкреплены достаточной доказательной базой. Кроме того, недоказанные утверждения и слухи преподносились как факты. В своих правках я руководствовалась правилами Википедии о биографиях живущих людей, нейтральной точке зрения, проверяемости источников и т.д., которые систематически нарушались вышеозначенными пользователями при написании данной статьи. Что делать в такой ситуации мне, как новичку, с учетом того, что англоязычные администраторы принимают точку зрения пользователей Википедии с бОльшим рейтингом?
Orekhova, I will respond in English if you do not mind, since this is an issue here at en-wiki and this discussion may be of interest at the WP:BLP/N noticeboard. I looked into the issue and have protected the page for 2 weeks and edited out the disputed content to avoid a BLP violation until all issues are resolved at talk. Please continue the discussion there. --ddima/talk21:21, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dear DDima, I'm afraid your assistance needed again. Recently I have thoroughly reviewed and restructured the article Rinat Akhmetov, removed poorly sourced statements having put proven facts in chronological and logical order. Львівське is now systematically restoring his version though it includes statements violating WIKI policies about Verifiability, Biographies of living persons and gossip. Kindly assist on the matter. --Orekhova (talk) 06:59, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I just felt that there was no necessary need to have it stated in bold right up front. Actually most of the names should be moved out to a separate name section,.. it's too much clutter stated right up front. --ddima/talk00:47, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
One administrator at Commons has started a campaign on deleting Ukrainian pictures on grounds that there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine (for example here [5]). This can mean we soon will loose lots of pictures from Ukraine. Can something be done about this? Is this some old Soviet law that's lagging behind and the only one that cares about it is some administrator over at Commons? Närking (talk) 19:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I note this edit by you to the image in an attempt to add a fair use rationale for each use of the item. Please be aware that group rationales are inappropriate, as per WP:NFCC #10c a separate, specific non-free rationale for each use is required. Please correct the image description page with this in mind. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 17:08, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'd love to add the information about the Ukranian president to the article. I've tried to translate this article (I think that's the original article, can you confirm this?) but Google Translate sucks. Do you think you could translate the article for me? Regards, Theleftorium(talk)13:32, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that's the original article,.. the Ukrainian article really is really just a summary of the 5 minute Simpson's segment and events featuring the Ukrainian gangsters, otherwise the rest of the information is already covered in the English article I linked to earlier (glavcom.ua). The only real bit of useful information is in first paragraph... here's the translation:
Directors of the American sitcom "The Simpsons" poked fun at a personality in the first episode of its 23rd season, the likes of which were closely resembling Viktor Yanukovich. The cartoon personality, with a huge resemblance to the current Ukrainian president, was not the first real life person to have been parodied by creator Matt Groening. For the 23 years that the show has been in production, numerous presidents made fun of, from Reagan and Gorbachev to Clinton and Obama.
And another paragraph at the end with some useful tidbits:
Together with the cartoon segment (featuring Yanukovich), a interesting aspect of the segment is the image of Ukraine and it's Viktor (the President) which has been earned in the States and equally portrayed by The Simpson's creators; a nation ruled by a gangster, which himself has no computer and internet skills. This is all indicative of the warm welcome Ukraine's Yanukovich received from Barack Obama. (background story--Yanukovich was hoping for a full-on dialogue with Obama, only to be snubbed and to have less than a minute of conversation)
That's great, thanks! Do you know the name of the website glavcom.ua (in both its original language and in English), and the name of the author? Also, would you say it's a reliable site? Theleftorium(talk)17:06, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about the late response. The name is (Главком) in Ukrainian and Glavkom in English transliteration. The author is 'Vitaliy Chervonenko'. I'd trust it,.. it's a news website and isn't biased or anything. —ddima (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kiev Pogroms Question
Hi! A quick question, I posted the Kiev Pogroms (with a link to the Wiki Article) under "Ukraine Cossacks" because it dealt with Cossacks and the Ukraine. But would it be better to just start an entirely new topic heading in Cossacks (just Kiev Pogroms) or do you have another recommendation. I'm just trying to figure out how to link the two. Thanks so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.25.12.9 (talk) 03:46, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
New Page Patrol survey
New page patrol – Survey Invitation
Hello DDima/Archive 4! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey
Ukraine
Hi DDima, I think that you have been one of the main editors on the Ukraine article. As is mentioned on the talk page, it does seem to be in pretty bad shape for a GA and I would like to register it for a reassessment. It seems as though most of the work was done in 2007 and little remedial work has been done since. Around a quarter of the text (or so) is uncited and there seems to be various nationalisms at play. I thought I'd run this past you, as you have been involved with the article for a long time. Thank you for all your many contributions to Wikipedia. These comments are not meant as a reflection on your or your editing. I look forward to hearing your thoughts. If you reply here on this page it will help to keep the conversation together. Cheers and happy editing. Span (talk)06:50, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dnepropetrovsk - request for comment
If you have time please could you comment on whether the article on the city of Dnepropetrovsk should have a list of mayors as part of the article, or whether the list should be a separate article. The list can be seen in old versions of the article, but was deleted on 18 November.
When you say in your edit summary, "...The declaration of independence and recognition by Russia and their puppets is irrelevant. Abkhazia is a internationally recognized subdivision of Georgia." Your stating a POV position which is fully counter to the de facto position on the ground. It is your opinion, which is shared by some governments, but not others. This is exactly what we are trying to avoid with NPOV. These are equal positions and should be presented as such. I agree with your edit because it is a minority language and should be included, but your argument is very flawed and is misused either way. Outback the koala (talk) 09:02, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. My language was pretty heavy in POV, I was trying to counter the edits of a certain user on that page. I guess my political beliefs on that controversial topic don't help either! Really, that's the problem with Wikipedia, everyone keeps trying to push their own POV at the expense of another viewpoint, and that is where the project gets lost and looses focus on what we should be concentrating on.. —ddima (talk) 18:41, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
True, we all have a POV, but I do try to keep mine out of the discussion. Often I state it on a talk for disclosure, this avoids timewasting accusations right off the bat. Discussion are better with more in the middle, not on sides dukeing it out. Food for thought :) Outback the koala (talk) 07:37, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]