 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ddstretch. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi. Knowledgekid87, whom you unblocked recently because he assured you he would stop stirring up trouble, is stirring the pot again by posting to Lightbreather with trivia about me. See: Knowledgekid87 posts to Lightbreather to stir the pot
Now that Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather is open, he is getting involved again. He reverted my post to him (the first time I've ever posted on his page) [1] to warn him. He's caused a lot of trouble by this sort of thing. He deleted from his page a reminder from the Arb clerk to stop editing Arbcom pages regarding this case that only arbs and clerks are allowed to edit. Please nip this in the bud before it gets out of hand. He's already been involved in discussions, now hatted, at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather/Evidence. Hope my asking this isn't an intrusion. But this case already shows signs of becoming a big brouhaha. Please do nip this. Thanks, EChastain (talk) 01:10, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- I find it very unusual and disrespectful that you would post a "Mission accomplished" message when deleting an archive of edits involving LB while she is a part of an active arbcom case. How did you get involved anyways and why have you been tracking her edits? LB has stated in her evidence that editors have been on her back. As for the arbcom case, I follow the GGTF page, I made a mistake by posting in the wrong spot and my questions were answered anyways. [2] - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:20, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)I did no such thing, Knowledgekid87. You're reading a meaning into something I did that has noting to do with you or Lightbreather. I don't know what you could possibly mean, but you're trying to stir up trouble by agitating Lightbreather when she's already probably very stressed. Why would you want to increase stress for her with something that's irrelevant by trying to read possible meaning into a meaningless act? EChastain (talk) 01:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- EC... the edits you deleted were tracking LB, the proof is in the edit diff above. Those links are linked to LB's edits from the time you took her to ANI to her gun control posts: [3][4][5][6] Now how can you sit there and say "You're reading a meaning into something I did that has noting to do with you or Lightbreather"? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Anyways if it has nothing to do with LB then there should be no concern with my post [7], I said to LB to make what you want of it. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- This isn't the only recent instance of you trying to stir up trouble though is it Knowledgekid87. I think it's very clear that you have failed to honour your commitment. Eric Corbett 02:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- I want to add that this isn't an isolated instance with EChastain, if this [8] isn't stirring up trouble I don't know what is. The thread had last been replied to 9 days ago that involved a heated debate and EC was linking to a diff that was almost a month old. This edit comes despite Chillum's warning on her talkpage [9]. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- For the record: I was already aware of EChastain compiling information about me before Knowledgekid87 posted to my page; I had been aware of it for months. However, I ask Knowledgekid87 to refrain from making further such posts to my talk page while the ArbCom is open. Thanks. Lightbreather (talk) 20:15, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
I think the main problem with all of this is that too many people are addicted to drama, and just cannot help themselves. Some seize upon an area of drama that, for whatever reason, attracts them and they become as if a red mist clouds their eyesight when the main thing they should be doing here is writing content. As you can see, I am fed up with the inability of people to hold to commitments made to avoid drama, and to people who respond and stir up things into frenzies that do nothing but harm everyone and stop people writing content. I am sorry that I cannot appear to take sides at the moment. While you all have been bickering over things that should be ignorable, I have spent the day trying to get adequate medical treatment for my seriously ill son in China, where one can never trust doctors to be impartial, rather than in the pockets of drug companies, or who see any psychological problem as being solved by intensive (and I mean intensive) ECT treatment that destroys people's minds. In the light of that, I am sorry, but I hope you can all appreciate that I have neither the time nor the inclination to do anything other than tell you all to grow up and stop behaving like tittle-tattling little children. Now, if you feel that is worthy of a complaint against me, go ahead and make it. But, deep in your hearts, I suspect you all know what the truth is. I suggest you all drop whatever sticks, missiles, A bombs F bombs or other weapons you have, and turn your minds to writing content. DDStretch (talk) 17:14, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- I'm sorry to hear about your son. Hopefully you can find him the medical help he needs. Eric Corbett 17:19, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hope your son gets better. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- I am sending healing thoughts your son's way, DDStretch. Lightbreather (talk) 20:17, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Sitush (talk) 16:43, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
The thread is here. Sorry to bother you when you have major real-life issues going on. This is mostly a courtesy notice. - Sitush (talk) 16:43, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
