It's wonderful to see you using edit summaries and engaging in constructive conversation on article talk pages and user talk pages. However, there may not be enough watchers of talk pages of promotional articles to notice some of your posts. In those cases, you can WP:BOLD and make the appropriate changes.
I like that you're adding references when you add content to articles. However, the punctuation should appear BEFORE the footnote. (See Help:Footnotes)
I see that ClueBot automatically reverted your edit to the Greg Stainer article, and wonder if the bot did it because you added the {{Death date and age}} template for someone who's not dead yet. It's interesting that adding the template without actual dates does not display the template to the user.
Another bot mentioned on your talk page that you accidentally introduced referencing errors in the Victims' rights article. I've fixed them for you (and made small edits to the other pages you've edited).
@GoingBatty Happy new year! Thank you ever so much for the excellent and constructive feedback. All noted. If you do not mind, if I am in doubt in the future I would like to leave my edits in draft format and consult with you before publishing. EditorialProject (talk) 21:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey GoingBatty,
I requested the Pending Changes Reviewer on the page request form. Given my edits history, as a typically new wikipedian, do you think i will be given?? And is it a matter of age? given that im 18 years?
I have been trying my best to see how i can contribute to this environment. I know its not your expertise, im just asking for suggestions. I appreciate the response. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place20:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Cameremote: Hi there! I'm not an administrator, so I haven't been involved in reviewing Pending Changes requests. I don't know whether administrators will consider three months and 800+ edits as a "measurable track record of editing".
No one would know your age if you didn't bring it up. However, I'm a bit confused by your user page. How can you be 18 years old if you were born in 2002? Why did your user page say you were 19 years old back in November but 18 years old now? How could you have joined Wikipedia in 2007 if you were born in 2002?
Next time you're editing the {{Infobox user}} on your user page, you may want to correct the wikilinks in the |languages= parameter and the duplicate |userboxes= parameters.
I appreciate your solid feedback. Concerning my infobox, I prefer to keep it ambiguous, hence, the conflict of interest.
However that does not challenge my ability to edit. And again, I might have to just stick to article creation, I noticed you keep reverting my edits, which is not good to my history. I appreciate you immensely. BTW, I thought you was a woman given your name😂Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place09:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate you immensely, you just don't know that your actions inspires me. I will be graduating from university next year, and I'm trying to clutch on Wikipedia. At least I have something to point at. Keep inspiring, my deliverables will be on fire> Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place20:45, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions to Clinical Advisory Network on Sex and Gender. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Just scrolling around wiki when I came across an article that's recently created about a Nigerian executive and was Af'ed. The article is Bala Wunti. when I made a quick Google search on the subject, he seems decently notable, given that he is an executive and the highest in his tier, reason that he manages Nigeria's crude assets.
Can you check and confirm? if you're not convenient, no need to participate. I just need you to clear my doubts. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place19:44, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Cameremote: Hi there! I'm not good at evaluating international sources. In the deletion discussion, I suggest you specifically mention which specific sources are independent of the subject, provide substantial coverage and are reliable. If those sources are not in the article, feel free to add them. I did tweak the citation templates and make other copyediting. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 20:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Presence (film)
Hi there - I watched the early premiere of Presence (2024 film) today and prepared a plot summary, but blanked it since I wasn't sure whether WP:Film instructs users to hold off until the "true" premiere, which is next week. What do you think? You appear to be active on WP:FUTFILM so I thought I'd ask you. Namelessposter (talk) 04:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Namelessposter: Hi there! MOS:FILMPLOT says "Provided the film is publicly available, citing it explicitly in the plot summary section is not necessary, since the film is the primary source and the infobox provides its details. Secondary sources must be used for all other cases, such as upcoming films (including those that had sneak previews and only played at film festivals)..., as these would not be considered generally available or verifiable." So I agree with your desire to wait until after the general release. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 05:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Naval War College, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
@Wfae: I don't understand this post, and how it would relate to Wikipedia. I also don't understand why you are using my talk page to try to start conversations with other editors (including a bot that cannot respond to you). GoingBatty (talk) 15:27, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I guess the bot is malfunctioning, as it has recently dropped messages on my talkpage which does not relate to the entire discussion. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place16:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to leave a brief note to say THANK YOU! Your edit suggestions and guidance were invaluable, as I am still learning quite a bit here. I also left the following note below when I clicked published to resubmit. But I wanted to make sure you saw it as well. Once again, thank you for your help. I am now really starting to understand this process. Thanks! Here's what I left --
Did my homework and have really enjoyed this deep dive process! I added a new section showing the extensive preliminary work with primates, leading up to making the surgery available for humans.
All citations are in, and I also hyperlinked medical terms (for example, photorefractive keratectomy) and others to their respective wikipedia links.
HI. I see the "1 notice," asking to "Find sources" but I don't see a specific issue you've identified. I apologize! Could you share what I may have missed? And again, thank you for your help with this! Editora89119 (talk) 13:50, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Long time no ping, been at school. However, I returned and noticed that most of the pages I created about the House Committees of the National Assembly (Nigeria) have been moved individually with the action removing the "(Nigeria)" at the end of the title. What do you think about this operation? before creating each page, I made sure there's no ambiguity as most nations have house committees, like the US for example and to avoid confusion, for already existing house committees and incoming ones. Readers would prefer knowing exactly which nation owns the particular legislative committee they are reading about. This is just my opinion, what do you think?
Wikipedia:Disambiguation states "Disambiguation in Wikipedia is the process of resolving conflicts that arise when a potential article title is ambiguous, most often because it refers to more than one subject covered by Wikipedia..."
