User talk:Redxiv

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!

Just a few quick tips:

• Our Tutorial explains how to edit; you can experiment in the test area.
• We have help pages, and if they don't help (can happen :-), post a question at the Help Desk.
• Remember that we strive to have unbiased articles.
• Eventually, you might want to read our Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
• Use the "Preview" button below the edit box! It helps you catch layout, format, and spelling errors before saving.
• To sign your messages (to talk pages, for instance—like I do below), add four tildes (~~~~) to your posts. The software will replace them by your signature and a time stamp when you save the page.

Anyway, have fun improving this encyclopedia! Lupo 15:34, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Why did you tag this image as {{PD}}? The external site clearly states "Content ©2000-2004 by Mecha & Anime HQ"... Lupo 15:34, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Because the owners of that website didn't create the image, nor do they own the copyrights to it.

Well then, who created it and owns the copyright? Lupo 15:37, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Sunrise, the same company that owns everything Gundam-related.

And can you point me to a statement of that company where they say that they release their images into the public domain? Or can you provide proof that their copyright has expired? Lupo 15:55, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This sounds mean, but I think he's just upset with me because I challenged his move to combine the articles into one page. However, those pictures (and the UC ship ones as well) should qualify for fair use. Aqua008's user page contains a discussion over this topic. He and I had this discussion when the Alexandria class cruiser was placed on the cleanup page for various reasons, among them the lack of a picture.

When you condensed the UC ships into a templete (thanks for doing that, I still don't know how :-)) you included a spot for Jupritis, but the page already exists as Jupitris class (Gundam). Thought you should know. TomStar81 05:57, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Whoops. It wasn't linked from the other pages, so I assumed it wasn't there. Oh, and making the template was easy. All I did was copy the table from the UC ship pages, then start up an entry named "Template:Universal Century ship classes" and paste the table into it. Then I replaced the table in those pages with "{{Template:Universal Century ship classes}}". Redxiv 07:19, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• For the record, most of the UC era ships are already their- if you click on the bottom link that reads "Gundam Space Vessels" you can see all the ship classes (or specific ships, if the content permits) that have been created. At any rate, the problem be solved. Thanks TomStar81 05:14, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I found some live amunition to use in defense of the alleged copyvio-ed CE era ships. It seems that the Anon (and me, and Aqua008) should have read a little further down MAHQ's FaQ page. About the faq's after the image one you find this:

Q: Would you send me files? A: Sorry, we don't have time to send anyone files. If you want images that are on the site, feel free to take them. If you're asking for reviews, don't even bother.

Note the part in bold- they are practically begging the public to make use of the images. That combined with an allready established fairuse use for the UC era ships- obtained from the same site as the CE ships- should cement our case for keeping them. TomStar81 05:14, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Well, that should put it to rest. But if worst comes to worst, I can upload screenshots (like I've done for ships where I couldn't find lineart at the time, or in one case because the only one I could find was on Gundam Official, which specifically says not to re-use their images on other websites), which are specifically listed here on Wikipedia as an exampe of fair use images. Redxiv 07:08, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• • I noticed one of the pictures you uploaded for the CE vessels was a screenshot. In cases where the picture is a screenshot, you can use the templete {screenshot} to produce a copyright tag for it. TomStar81 02:34, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• • • Thanks. I'll remember that if and when I get around to making entries for the smaller Earth Alliance naval ships. It'd probably be a combined entry, since there's so very little info on them that I've seen (basically just observations of them on-screen). Redxiv 00:16, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Could you please vote on the proposed move Links between Iraq and Al-Qaeda → Alleged links between pre-invasion Iraq and Al-Qaeda? The vote is here. I am opposed to the move since "alleged" is POV and prejudges the evidence. Thanks. ObsidianOrder 11:50, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Nice work on the Kim Possible pages! Keep up the great work! =D Jumping cheese 04:49, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey -- BTW, although I disagree with you about the ideal result of all these, I think there's something seriously wrong with having many small-group deletion debates, like Brian Crawford has been doing. Basically, he's set it up so that we get to have 20 general debates instead of ONE general debate, on the premise that a general debate about only 5 articles is better than a general debate about 100. I totally disagree. I wish I could make this point well, but I really can't because I don't know the Gundam world that well. Surely some of these group nominations include more major robots with some minor ones? I just don't know which are which, but I wish someone would point that out. Mangojuice 19:24, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree that splitting them apart for what's clearly a single debate is silly. I get the impression that Crawford thinks he's more likely to succeed that way. That he'll be able to get one of his clusters deleted, then use that as precedent for the rest. As for which are major and which are minor, the Windams and the ones with "Dagger" in their name tend to be "grunt" machines, while the ones with "Gundam" in their names are usually piloted by major heroes and villains of the series. Redxiv 19:33, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've changed my vote to keep on the basis of this bogus grouping. Interesting about the Windham/Dagger/Gundam distinction, but that doesn't quite imply a difference in overall importance. Feel free to alert me if any more groups come up and I'll vote similarly... normally, I might consider that vote stacking, but in this case, it's really all one big debate. Mangojuice 19:51, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The GAT-X105 Strike Gundam is piloted by the main character of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED for more than half the series, and the GAT-X303 Aegis Gundam is piloted by the #2 character of the series for a similar length of time. The Aegis Gundam is replaced by the ZGMF-X09A Justice Gundam later on. The GAT-X102 Duel Gundam is piloted by the main character's rival for the entirety of the series. The GAT-X105E Strike Noir is the main mobile suit of the upcoming series Mobile Suit Gundam SEED C.E. 73 Stargazer. The GFAS-X1 Destroy Gundam is fairly major recurring threat in Mobile Suit Gundam SEED Destiny (there are 9 of them). And one of the 3 CAT1-X Hyperion Gundam series mobile suits is piloted by one of the main characters of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED X Astray. Those are probably the most notable ones that have been nominated so far. Redxiv 20:12, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have something you need to say to me? If so, leave it on my talk page and quit cluttering AfD with questions about my contributions and motives. AfD isn't the place to air personal differences. Apparently, cartoon robots mean the world to you. To me, they mean nothing. I doubt we'll agree on how important they are. I'm going to keep nominating these articles as I see fit. You can choose to work with me, and discuss merging or transwiki, or you can choose to make snide comments that have nothing to do with the nominations. Either way, there's a time and place for both, and AfD isn't the place to discuss me personally. Brian G. Crawford 01:24, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• If they "mean nothing" to you, why is it so important to remove them? To stroke your ego by declaring things you personally find uninteresting to be irrelevant to everyone? Redxiv 01:29, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Redxiv,

With all the deleteing going on, we would like your help in trying to preserve these MS articles. Would you mind joining WP:CE. - Plau 10:37, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Reply on my talk anyway.

A tag has been placed on ZGMF-X42S Destiny Gundam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted under Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. If you can indicate how ZGMF-X42S Destiny Gundam is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}}, and also put a note on Talk:ZGMF-X42S Destiny Gundam saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions.

PS. The page was originally deleted following discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CAT1-X Hyperion Gundam series, which you may like to read. WJBscribe ^{(WJB talk)} 03:07, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm well aware of that highly improper AfD, where an admin arbitrarily (and, if I may say, randomly) created a consensus for deletion out of thin air that wasn't actually reached in the AfD. Oddly enough, he went on indefinite hiatus shortly afterward. I wonder why. Anyway, I think I already more than adequately explained why this particular article shouldn't have been deleted. As the title mecha of Gundam SEED Destiny, piloted by that series' main character, the Destiny Gundam is certainly more worthy of inclusion than several of the articles that survived that AfD. Redxiv 18:53, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see nothing "highly improper" in that AfD or in the decisions made by Doug Bell after a complex and protracted debate. I gather that the importance of the subject of the artice has not changed since that AfD. If you feel that there was something wrong with the decision, I suggest you start a deletion review (see WP:DRV). I think you may have some difficulty however given that over two weeks have elapsed without any challenge of the decision. I wish you luck in your arguments through the proper channels. However, until you are succesfull, WP:CSD G4 appears to require the article's deletion. I will therefore again be tagging it for deletion and I suspect an admin will delete it inspite of your eloquent argument on the Talk page.

PS. In reply to your question as to Doug Bell's break from Wikipedia, as I understand it he is unhappy with a decision of the Arbitration Committee in a matter unrelated to the AfD process. To my knowledge he is a highly respected admin and I hope that he will soon return to contributing fully. WJBscribe ^{(WJB talk)} 01:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read my nominations? Are you aware of how many policies these articles comprehensively fail? Please. Less bad faith. If you want to be part of the solution and not part of the problem, join the dsicussion at WP:GUNDAM. Moreschi ^Deletion! 22:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your assertion of policy violation doesn't make it so, and the biggest argument against these articles seems to be "in universe style", which relates to a non-binding guideline rather than to any policy. Redxiv 22:23, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um, no actually. WP:V and WP:OR are both policy and non-negotiable. These articles are completely unreferenced and contain large chunks of OR. Virtually none of these articles assert real-world notability, which is in fact a WP:SPEEDY deletion criterion. Moreschi ^Deletion! 22:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which doesn't mean an article violates policy because you say it does. BTW, WP:IAR is also policy. Redxiv 22:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uh-huh. And now we are supposed to let completely unreferenced articles that do not assert notability survive because of IAR. Somehow, I don't think so. Moreschi ^Deletion! 22:35, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if you misinterpreted this, but nearly all of the information is still there. The introductory section to both articles is now under the appropriate clan's subheader in Land of Fire#Clans. All of their ranked ninja have been moved to List of Konoha ninja. Most of the unranked ninja have been moved to the Land of Fire#Villagers, and Snapper deleted a select few that were unimportant in the grand scheme of things (namely, the unranked Uchiha that Itachi kills in Sasuke's flashback). It's all still there. You Can't See Me! 20:15, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't notice that, I was just looking at the talk pages for the Clans' articles. I only noticed because Obito Uchiha redirected to Land of Fire and (at the time) his name didn't even appear in that article. Which is something that needs to be addressed with this merge: fixing the character name redirects that used to go to Hyuga clan and Uchiha clan. Redxiv 05:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I think I've handled all of them myself. Redxiv 06:18, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Might want to review your definition of consensus. 14-5 is a clear sign that the community has decided what it wants. This is not in dispute, and has not been for some time. Bringing it up again will have no benefit. ⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 07:04, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus is not a vote, and I find your numbers suspect anyway. Redxiv 07:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This in reference to your recent edits to List of Code Geass characters article. Please see the official character booklet supplied with Sunrise's Code Geass Mosaic Kakera CD; here is an image of the booklet, where it is clearly stated that her name is Karen Stadtfeld. ···巌流^{? · Talk to Ganryuu} 13:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good enough for me, then. Thanks. — Red XIV ^(talk) 02:38, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RJaguar3 | u | t 02:27, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Aegis class cruiser (Gundam).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Compton (Gundam).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tama.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Yume (Tenchi Muyo).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redxiv. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Soviet cruiser Mikhail Kutuzov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nikolayev. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redxiv. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited King of Kings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lord of Lords (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redxiv. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please join a discussion here regarding whether the terms "First Lady of the United States Designate" and "Second Gentleman of the United States Designate" should be in the infoboxes of Jill Biden and Doug Emhoff, spouses of the president-elect and vice president-elect, respectively. We need to come to a consensus. Thank you for your participation. cookie monster (2020) 755 21:33, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Οἶδα. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Matt Taibbi seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Οἶδα (talk) 19:42, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redxiv, If you would like to incorporate Taibbi's statement into a "Views" section on his article I reckon that could be helpful. I have tried to update his article in the past to properly reflect his change of views. Wikipedia has a history of whitewashing the views of some commentators. I am not trying to contribute to that. The article for Tim Pool comes to mind. Οἶδα (talk) 05:16, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have used an edit summary that did not appear to be appropriate, civil, or otherwise constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FossilPoet (talk) 05:28, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm assuming good faith re this edit, but I'm also asking that you reverify that this added assertion is indeed supported by the supporting source cited. If not, it would seem to be original research, which is disallowed in Wikipedia articles. If the assertion is not supported by the cited source, please cite a supporting source or remove it. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 09:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Russo-Ukrainian War. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:24, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]