User talk:Slumgum

Archives

15•11•05 — 15•05•06 15•05•06 — 15•11•06 15•11•06 — 15•05•07

Hi there, seeing that you're an administrator and Arsenal fan, I have a question for you. What happens when someone uploads an image to commons, but it is not used for a Wikipedia article? Does the image warrant deletion? I ask because all the "extra" Gilberto images uploaded by GilbertoSilvaFan are being tagged for deletion. Thanks. Chensiyuan 06:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, there is no reason for the Gilberto images to be speedily deleted. They are free to use, which means they don't need to be deleted. Most of them are actually in use. The reason given for speedy deletion is This is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. which is not accurate. I see no valid reason for speedy deletion.  Sʟυмgυм • т • c  09:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought so too, why do you think that person tagged them for deletion??? What can be done about them... Chensiyuan 09:45, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I also forgot that if an image is stored on the commons, it's not necessary to store it on wikipedia. As an example, this image (chosen at random) has no image description page, because it is not wikipedia-hosted, it's only on the commons. Compare Image:Gilberto against Villa.jpg with Commons Image:Gilberto_against_Villa.jpg. Both display the same image URL. Therefore, a speedy deletion on a wikipedia image that is stored on the commons will delete only the description page.  Sʟυмgυм • т • c  10:46, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS. I feel very hungry after seeing the images on your user page.

Thanks for the clarification... regarding the food pics, well they are supposed to! Chensiyuan 10:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Would you have any interest in contributing a suggestion or adding your support to the nomination of Derry City F.C. for featured article status? Cheers. Danny Invincible^Talk|Edits 03:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the Arsenal and Gilberto Silva articles are FAs, and the Thierry Henry and Fabregas ones GAs, do you think there's a legitimate claim for featured topic? Chensiyuan 21:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It had never occurred to me before, but it sounds like possibility. Looking at Wikipedia:Featured topic criteria, it seems that there are a couple of big obstacles:

• 5. There is no obvious gap (missing or stub article) in the topic. when combined with:
• 6. Each article is of high quality

..means that all the players need good articles. Furthermore, one of the 'Recommendations' is that: The topic is not overly large. There are currently 30 players listed in the squad, but I don't see why that is really a problem. It depends on the scope of the topic - do we want to include the articles listed on {{Arsenal F.C.}}? Finding enough information to make a good article for each of the younger players however, is going to very difficult - many are currently stub class. Perhaps we should bring it up at the Arsenal F.C. article. I think User:Qwghlm could be a good ally if we want to go for this, as he contributed much to Arsenal's FA status. I've never really tried to create an FA, except to help out GilbertoSilvaFan with a few questions, so I may not be the most useful editor for such a challenge, but I'll help.  Sʟυмgυм • т • c  18:11, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote.

Football club names has been selected as the new collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Talk started at User talk:Jimbo online#Grays Athletic F.C. squad

I have been updating and adding such relevant players. All the new articles I created are deemed as relevant to Grays Athletic, as I would not have added them. Hence why I have not created articles for Moses Fakolade, Freddy Tandon, Luke Woodward, Danny Baigent or Ashley Barnes.

Thank you for your concern. Jimbo_online 00:45, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Template:Infobox Football All-Ireland 2. I do not think that Template:Infobox Football All-Ireland 2 fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because redundancy is not a reason to speedy delete a template. It can be a reson to nominate at WP:TfD, but soemtimes the discussion there will decide on a redirect or other non-deletion solution. Sometimes there ar reasons for keeping two diffretn tempaltes that at first seem redundant. so i suggest raising the matter there.. I request that you consider not re-tagging Template:Infobox Football All-Ireland 2 for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk) 20:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Much the same reasoning applies to Template:Infobox Hurling All-Ireland 2. DES ^(talk) 20:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did not place the tag on either template. Please look again carefully.  slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 20:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, i misread the history. I will copy these msgs to the proper user. Thanks for lettign me know of my error. DES ^(talk) 20:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have just restored this page which was incorrectly deleted. The alleged copyvio is a public domain U.S. government website (and one which unusually is actually explicit about the public domain nature of its material - see its Privacy Policy, point 2.) I would like to note, as an aside, that, although listed first, I was not the original author of that page - the early history has been lost during software upgrages. Rmhermen 18:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for bringing this to my attention.  slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 18:30, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please, read the article Flag of the Soviet Union before you revert my changes next time. 1923 version of the flag was used only until 1955 or was replaced even earlier. Cmapm 23:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did read it. The flag did not change in 1955, but in 1980. The info you added does not mention a change of flag at all, rather a ruling to ensure the correct manufacture of the flag, the general design of which was implemented from 1923 - 1980. The 1980 flag is a brighter red, and should not be added to articles concerning events before then.  slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 23:22, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It did change, please read this from the 1955 description:"Sharp tip of the sickle lies in the center of the upper side of the square, handles of hammer and sickle rest in bottom corners of the square." I.e. tip of the sickle should be equidistant from tips of handles of the sickle and the hammer. Now look at 1923 version and then - at Image:Flag of the Soviet Union.svg. Cmapm 23:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I now agree that it did change, but it was not easy to work out. I have just made a small change to the article to clarify it and remove the contradiction below the 2nd pictured flag. I still think it's better to use the 1923 flag for events before 1980, as the colour change is more noticeable in flagicon form than the symbol change.  slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 14:41, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded 1955-1980 version: Image:Flag of the Soviet Union 1955.svg, but have no time to fix corresponding pages so far. Cmapm 18:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why was 'The 7 Day Theory' Deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.12.222.44 (talk • contribs)

Well, I deleted The Seven Day Theory because it was a redirect to a non-existent article.  slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 14:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Valenciennes.gif Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Valenciennes.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigrTex 01:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Le_Mans_UC72.gif I have tagged Image:Le_Mans_UC72.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 01:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]	Image:FC_Lorient.gif I have tagged Image:FC_Lorient.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 01:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorted.  slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 17:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to check on your reason for removing the reference from Shrewsbury Town F.C.. Was it because football squads aren't normally referenced due to them changing frequently, or because the referenced page became out of date and wasn't updated quickly enough? Just curious... cheers. --Jameboy 16:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was simply because the page was long out of date and inaccurate...for example, two players at #6, one called Lee Canoville, another called Lee Tanobille. Lee Canoville left in May. I think wikipedia could the only place where the squad list is remotely up to date or accurate!  slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 16:30, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you edited many French football squad templates today. However, using this edit as an example, you removed Guillaume Moullec yet left the {{FC Lorient squad}} on his page. Similar occured for many players over several templates. :(

I appreciate your efforts, but I thought I should mention this. Most French transfers do not create news in the English-language world, so any help from France is useful.  slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 19:13, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've updated the templates, but not the player's page (I've forgotten, sorry...), but don't worry, the templates are correct, and I'm gonna update the player's articles as soon as I can (i.e. tonight or tomorrow).Thanks for your remark.--Latouffedisco 20:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to {{FA Cup Finals}} did work, but it requires all the articles to call the template between {{fb start}} and {{fb end}}. At the moment, none of the articles do that. You can either go back to your edit and convert all 126 articles or leave it as it is. I would favour the first option but it's more work.  slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 12:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for messing up the format like that, I'm a little peeved that I didn't realise that I'd made that mistake. I may be a 4th rate code monkey, but I should've worked that out, given my experience. And since I make edits in my copious free time, I'm up for editting all 126 articles, though it might not happen all in one sitting. Thanks for pointing that out, by the way. I was utterly at a loss as to why it had failed.

By the way, I first had the idea to edit that template when I was working on a different prototype. It looks a little odd to my mind, so I figured I'd ask someone such as yourself, with more practise in templates and what works on Wiki. I'm half-way through making another template for the FA Cup seasons, as opposed to just the Finals which are on the template you assisted me with. I don't intend to make the existing Cup Finals template superfluous, though if it reaches acceptance over time, that might happen (though I tend to have humble aspirations for my own creations, so I'm not even giving it thought). My template is more along the lines of the template for Premier League seasons, only with an added part in small text, a la Template:2006-07 in European Football (UEFA) for the finals (see the bottom line, "EUFA Competitions"). The problem is that we already have this template for the FA Cup Finals, and quite frankly 50% of the articles I would add to the template haven't been written - being every FA Cup season article before 2003. This might well make the template look stupid, it would certainly be covered in red links, and for such a lengthy template, that might be inexcusable. On the other hand, I tend to think "if this template continues to be used, will it be useful 10 years into the future?" and in my opinion, as more and more FA Cup season articles are written, it will be useful. Especially if we cut off all of the dead links, or go with my fall-back option, which is to just replace the red links with the Cup Final article for that year.

But as I said before, I bow to your much more impressive experience. What would you do in this circumstance? While I wait for your reply, I'll get on with adding {{fb start}}s and {{fb end}}s to stuff. Thanks for your time and help. Falastur2 12:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to FA Cup seasons articles, I would wait a while until a few more season articles are created. That way we can see if there is a demand for them or if people desire to create them. As a rule of thumb, I wouldn't really want to create a navigation template for mostly red links, so I would wait on 50% of the articles to be created. Category:FA Cup has 5 FA Cup seasons in it; 2 modern, 3 historical, so people are gradually making the older articles. btw, I actually created the FA Cup season article last year and many users contributed after that.  slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 13:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point, and though I enjoy having templates which I can call my own, I was largely coming to agree with you. I'll start what articles I can and see what happens, though when I don't have resources to do so, I tend to rein back and decide that the articles are best left to those who do know. At the moment, as my contribution history shows, I tend to just add code to pages to make them look better, but I'll do what I can to add more articles. Thanks for the suggestion, anyhow. Falastur2 13:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re you edit to FA Cup (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FA_Cup&curid=11237&diff=141372897&oldid=141367640). What do you mean by "Marlow must have more"? Just out of interest. slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 13:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Only that as Marlow have entered all FA Cups except one, and have never won the trophy, they must have more losses than any other team (including Reading). - fchd 15:16, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the breaks? It looks horrible! lol seven+one 20:42, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will it return to "normal" after the squad numbers are implemented? seven+one 21:21, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, perfect now. Keep up the good work seven+one 21:40, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck! I thought I'd help but I didn't see any bullets in the fifty-odd templates I checked, so there can't be too many seven+one 21:49, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed you moved the page from Stewart Drummond to Stuart Drummond (footballer) in April 2006. Do you have any definitive source for Drummond's first name? Some say Stuart, some say Stewart. I'm inclined to believe in Stewart (Sky Sports, Shropshire Star) more than Stuart (Soccerbase, premiumtv group) based on experiences with them in the past.  slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 17:30, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you may be right. This and this would also suggest that Stewart is more commonly used. I must have assumed soccerbase to be accurate although, like yourself, I have since come accross many inaccuracies on their site. Forbsey 16:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I just heard the squad numbers for 2007-08 so I'll update the name as well.  slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 17:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been doing quite a lot of work on the article of Joey Barton recently and was hoping to get your professional opinion on it. Is it GA Class yet, or anywhere near GA and what do you think can be done to improve it? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Sir-Nobby 10:26, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent it to be peer reviewed. Thanks for the help. Sir-Nobby 22:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you put a suggestion on Talk:List of English Football League managers by date of appointment regarding date math. I've added to the talk page a different date math that I think would work well with that table - however, I'm rubbish at tables and would take me ages to get it completed and formatted well. Keep an eye on that page in case anyone else thinks its worth doing. Seedybob2 23:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As you are a previous contributor to the above, could I ask for your input one way or the other, regarding a difference as to whether the subject is a freemason or not (as stated by the prime declared source MQ Magazine)? The editor claims to be the webmaster for Mr Winter's personal website, and claims also to have authorisation from him to remove the statement from the above article. The conversation regarding this subject has been carried out on my own talk page, but primarily on User talk:ComeOnBoro. I have also received private email from the user.

I have urged the editor to take this to the article talk page, but there seems to be some reluctance. Meanwhile, I have been reverting his edits until such time as this can be resolved. I don't mind which way this goes, but I will not see sourced content removed on an apparent whim.

If you do not have time for this, I will understand. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 00:25, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, an editor has carried out a WP:LEAD and WP:NPOV on the info, it has not been reverted so far, so I assume the disputor is happy enough. Time will tell. Thanks for your help. Ref ^(chew)(do) 10:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not really asking for full feedback on this article (although I wouldn’t mind it). I’d just like to know what you feel the best way the divide up the Career section is, by Club, by season, not at all or some other way. Please leave your reply under the section in my talk page named “Milner Career section”. Buc 16:31, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Slumgum. I am thinking of including a few match articles regarding Stirling Albion F.C. the reason I would like to include these as they are notable in the clubs history and scottish football history. I was just wanting to know if you have used your template on any other match aticles or was this one just a suggestion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Matches. If it is a template that is in use is it easy to use? Please reply to my talk page thanks Gorillamusic 22:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I think I may have asked of this before, but this time round I'm seriously thinking of nominating Thierry Henry as a FAC. He's left Arsenal, but well. I'm really hoping for some feedback for his article. Thanks! Chensiyuan 15:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It took me ages to figure out what the   was actually for, I only worked it out quite recently. King of the NorthEast 14:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:MKDfs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've nominated the above for deletion. Following protocol this is by way of alerting you in case you have any objections. Meanwhile, best wishes. Bob (talk) 10:44, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Probably got almost nothing to do with you - except you're one of the 4 people who had a message posted on the PandPS discussion board. Regards Bob (talk) 08:45, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right. I didn't look closely enough, my mistake.

Lucha-Method (talk) 09:14, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss why you insist on removing the (c) from Neville on the Man Utd first team template. Darkson (BOOM! An interception!) 22:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, according to that link, there's no consensus that you've asked for (even beofre I put my 2p worth in), so please don't delete it until there's a consensus either way. Darkson (BOOM! An interception!) 09:51, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn't get back to you, I meant to it slipped off my radar. I have replied on the talk page at WP:FOOTY. Paul  Bradbury 08:05, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I get it now. Thanks for the info. Mario1987 11:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thx. Bneidror (talk) 13:23, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Slumgum. For info, we don't use sponsored names of stadiums where an established non-sponsored name exists (e.g. New Meadow). Cheers, пﮟოьεԻ 57 16:12, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, we use non-sponsor names when there is an established non-sponsored name. In the case of stadia like the Galpharm Stadium or JJB Stadium, there are no established non-sponsored names. However, New Meadow has been known as such for more than a year. пﮟოьεԻ 57 21:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is more that it has not had a sponsored title until now - arguing that it "is the only name the stadium has had" is obviously trot - we all know it as New Meadow. Regarding Arsenal and Swansea, their stadiums were renamed before the clubs actually moved in - it was only the projects which were known by those titles. Have a look at other examples where stadiums with widely established names have been given sponsor names, e.g. Dean Court, the Crown Ground, Victoria Road etc. пﮟოьεԻ 57 08:10, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, clearly I do understand. And don't use terms like "duh", or you'll get blocked for being incivil. пﮟოьεԻ 57 17:16, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. jjmihai (talk) 11:18, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Clermontfoot.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:43, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:F.C. Oţelul Galaţi, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:F.C. Oţelul Galaţi has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:F.C. Oţelul Galaţi, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:20, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is he the brother of John Flowers (footballer)?

I noted they were two of four people in Category:People from Edlington. A coicendence you think?--EchetusXe (talk) 14:45, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Template:Football player infobox2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 10:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Slumgum! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 21 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Glyn Thompson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Lionel Cappone - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Football squad templates, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 18:24, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Slumgum,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar ([[User talk:Jaobar|talk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.9.34.167 (talk) 21:32, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Slumgum,

I am looking for an experienced Wikipedian to contribute an article for our band Mr. Meeble. I have checked and we meet the Wikipedia "notability" guidelines for a band. We have a very basic Wikipedia article written already, but I know that someone like yourself may be able to point out our formatting errors and critical omissions. You can hear our music and see our videos here:

http://youtube.com/mrmeeble
http://soundcloud.com/meeble

Let me know if you would be willing to help!

Regards,
Devin
mm @ meeble.com

Devbot (talk) 03:36, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Football box wcstart has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 10:28, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Club Deportivo O'Higgins, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. MicroX (talk) 06:59, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 03:13, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Le Mans FC squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kq-hit (talk) 21:03, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Slumgum. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Slumgum. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Slumgum. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bury F.C. squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. JMHamo (talk) 18:11, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]