Share to:

 

Hepatocyte growth factor receptor

MET
Available structures
PDBOrtholog search: PDBe RCSB
Identifiers
AliasesMET, MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase, AUTS9, HGFR, RCCP2, c-Met, DFNB97, OSFD, c-met
External IDsOMIM: 164860; MGI: 96969; HomoloGene: 206; GeneCards: MET; OMA:MET - orthologs
Orthologs
SpeciesHumanMouse
Entrez

4233

17295

Ensembl

ENSG00000105976

ENSMUSG00000009376

UniProt

P08581

P16056

RefSeq (mRNA)

NM_000245
NM_001127500
NM_001324401
NM_001324402

NM_008591

RefSeq (protein)

NP_000236
NP_001120972
NP_001311330
NP_001311331

n/a

Location (UCSC)Chr 7: 116.67 – 116.8 MbChr 6: 17.46 – 17.57 Mb
PubMed search[3][4]
Wikidata
View/Edit HumanView/Edit Mouse

Hepatocyte growth factor receptor (HGF receptor)[5][6] is a protein that in humans is encoded by the MET gene. The protein possesses tyrosine kinase activity.[7] The primary single chain precursor protein is post-translationally cleaved to produce the alpha and beta subunits, which are disulfide linked to form the mature receptor.

HGF receptor is a single pass tyrosine kinase receptor essential for embryonic development, organogenesis and wound healing. Hepatocyte growth factor/Scatter Factor (HGF/SF) and its splicing isoform (NK1, NK2) are the only known ligands of the HGF receptor. MET is normally expressed by cells of epithelial origin, while expression of HGF/SF is restricted to cells of mesenchymal origin. When HGF/SF binds its cognate receptor MET it induces its dimerization through a not yet completely understood mechanism leading to its activation.

Sometimes MET is misunderstood as of an abbreviation of Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition. It is incorrect. The three letters of MET come from N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG). [8]

Abnormal MET activation in cancer correlates with poor prognosis, where aberrantly active MET triggers tumor growth, formation of new blood vessels (angiogenesis) that supply the tumor with nutrients, and cancer spread to other organs (metastasis). MET is deregulated in many types of human malignancies, including cancers of kidney, liver, stomach, breast, and brain. Normally, only stem cells and progenitor cells express MET, which allows these cells to grow invasively in order to generate new tissues in an embryo or regenerate damaged tissues in an adult. However, cancer stem cells are thought to hijack the ability of normal stem cells to express MET, and thus become the cause of cancer persistence and spread to other sites in the body. Both the overexpression of Met/HGFR, as well as its autocrine activation by co-expression of its hepatocyte growth factor ligand, have been implicated in oncogenesis.[9][10]

Various mutations in the MET gene are associated with papillary renal carcinoma.[11]

Gene

MET proto-oncogene (GeneID: 4233) has a total length of 125,982 bp, and it is located in the 7q31 locus of chromosome 7.[12] MET is transcribed into a 6,641 bp mature mRNA, which is then translated into a 1,390 amino-acid MET protein.

Protein

MET is a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) that is produced as a single-chain precursor. The precursor is proteolytically cleaved at a furin site to yield a highly glycosylated extracellular α-subunit and a transmembrane β-subunit, which are linked together by a disulfide bridge.[13]

Extracellular

  • Region of homology to semaphorins (Sema domain), which includes the full α-chain and the N-terminal part of the β-chain
  • Cysteine-rich MET-related sequence (MRS domain)
  • Glycine-proline-rich repeats (G-P repeats)
  • Four immunoglobulin-like structures (Ig domains), a typical protein-protein interaction region.[13]

Intracellular

A juxtamembrane segment that contains:

  • A serine residue (Ser 985), which inhibits the receptor kinase activity upon phosphorylation[14]
  • A tyrosine residue (Tyr 1003), which is responsible for MET polyubiquitination, endocytosis, and degradation upon interaction with the ubiquitin ligase CBL[15]
  • Tyrosine kinase domain, which mediates MET biological activity. Following MET activation, transphosphorylation occurs on Tyr 1234 and Tyr 1235
  • C-terminal region contains two crucial tyrosines (Tyr 1349 and Tyr 1356), which are inserted into the multisubstrate docking site, capable of recruiting downstream adapter proteins with Src homology-2 (SH2) domains.[16] The two tyrosines of the docking site have been reported to be necessary and sufficient for the signal transduction both in vitro.[16][17]

MET signaling pathway

MET activation by its ligand HGF induces MET kinase catalytic activity, which triggers transphosphorylation of the tyrosines Tyr 1234 and Tyr 1235. These two tyrosines engage various signal transducers,[18] thus initiating a whole spectrum of biological activities driven by MET, collectively known as the invasive growth program. The transducers interact with the intracellular multisubstrate docking site of MET either directly, such as GRB2, SHC,[19] SRC, and the p85 regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K),[19] or indirectly through the scaffolding protein Gab1[20]

Tyr 1349 and Tyr 1356 of the multisubstrate docking site are both involved in the interaction with GAB1, SRC, and SHC, while only Tyr 1356 is involved in the recruitment of GRB2, phospholipase C γ (PLC-γ), p85, and SHP2.[21]

GAB1 is a key coordinator of the cellular responses to MET and binds the MET intracellular region with high avidity, but low affinity.[22] Upon interaction with MET, GAB1 becomes phosphorylated on several tyrosine residues which, in turn, recruit a number of signalling effectors, including PI3K, SHP2, and PLC-γ. GAB1 phosphorylation by MET results in a sustained signal that mediates most of the downstream signaling pathways.[23]

Activation of signal transduction

MET engagement activates multiple signal transduction pathways:

Role in development

MET mediates a complex program known as invasive growth.[27] Activation of MET triggers mitogenesis, and morphogenesis.[32][33]

During embryonic development, transformation of the flat, two-layer germinal disc into a three-dimensional body depends on transition of some cells from an epithelial phenotype to spindle-shaped cells with motile behaviour, a mesenchymal phenotype. This process is referred to as epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT).[34] Later in embryonic development, MET is crucial for gastrulation, angiogenesis, myoblast migration, bone remodeling, and nerve sprouting among others.[35] MET is essential for embryogenesis, because MET −/− mice die in utero due to severe defects in placental development.[36] Along with Ectodysplasin A, it has been shown to be involved in the differentiation of anatomical placodes, precursors of scales, feathers and hair follicles in vertebrates.[37] Furthermore, MET is required for such critical processes as liver regeneration and wound healing during adulthood.[27]

HGF/MET axis is also involved in myocardial development. Both HGF and MET receptor mRNAs are co-expressed in cardiomyocytes from E7.5, soon after the heart has been determined, to E9.5. Transcripts for HGF ligand and receptor are first detected before the occurrence of cardiac beating and looping, and persist throughout the looping stage, when heart morphology begins to elaborate.[38] In avian studies, HGF was found in the myocardial layer of the atrioventricular canal, in a developmental stage in which the epithelial to mesenchymal transformation (EMT) of the endocardial cushion occurs.[39] However, MET is not essential for heart development, since α-MHCMet-KO mice show normal heart development.[40]

Expression

Tissue distribution

MET is normally expressed by epithelial cells.[27] However, MET is also found on endothelial cells, neurons, hepatocytes, hematopoietic cells, melanocytes and neonatal cardiomyocytes.[33][41] HGF expression is restricted to cells of mesenchymal origin.[34]

Transcriptional control

MET transcription is activated by HGF and several growth factors.[42] MET promoter has four putative binding sites for Ets, a family of transcription factors that control several invasive growth genes.[42] ETS1 activates MET transcription in vitro.[43] MET transcription is activated by hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF1), which is activated by low concentration of intracellular oxygen.[44] HIF1 can bind to one of the several hypoxia response elements (HREs) in the MET promoter.[34] Hypoxia also activates transcription factor AP-1, which is involved in MET transcription.[34]

Clinical significance

Role in cancer

MET pathway plays an important role in the development of cancer through:

Coordinated down-regulation of both MET and its downstream effector extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 (ERK2) by miR-199a* may be effective in inhibiting not only cell proliferation but also motility and invasive capabilities of tumor cells.[46]

MET amplification has emerged as a potential biomarker of the clear cell tumor subtype.[47]

The amplification of the cell surface receptor MET often drives resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in colorectal cancer.[48]

Role in autism

The SFARIgene database lists MET with an autism score of 2.0, which indicates that it is a strong candidate for playing a role in cases of autism. The database also identifies at least one study that found a role for MET in cases of schizophrenia. The gene was first implicated in autism in a study that identified a polymorphism in the promoter of the MET gene.[49] The polymorphism reduces transcription by 50%. Further, the variant as an autism risk polymorphism has been replicated, and shown to be enriched in children with autism and gastrointestinal disturbances.[50] A rare mutation has been found that appears in two family members, one with autism and the other with a social and communication disorder.[51] The role of the receptor in brain development is distinct from its role in other developmental processes. Activation of the MET receptor regulates synapse formation[52][53][54][55][56] and can impact the development and function of circuits involved in social and emotional behavior.[57]

Role in heart function

In adult mice, MET is required to protect cardiomyocytes by preventing age-related oxidative stress, apoptosis, fibrosis and cardiac dysfunction.[40] Moreover, MET inhibitors, such as crizotinib or PF-04254644, have been tested by short-term treatments in cellular and preclinical models, and have been shown to induce cardiomyocytes death through ROS production, activation of caspases, metabolism alteration and blockage of ion channels.[58][59]

In the injured heart, HGF/MET axis plays important roles in cardioprotection by promoting pro-survival (anti-apoptotic and anti-autophagic) effects in cardiomyocytes, angiogenesis, inhibition of fibrosis, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory signals, and regeneration through activation of cardiac stem cells.[60][61]

Interaction with tumour suppressor genes

PTEN

PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) is a tumor suppressor gene encoding a protein PTEN, which possesses lipid and protein phosphatase-dependent as well as phosphatase-independent activities.[62] PTEN protein phosphatase is able to interfere with MET signaling by dephosphorylating either PIP3 generated by PI3K, or the p52 isoform of SHC. SHC dephosphorylation inhibits recruitment of the GRB2 adapter to activated MET.[30]

VHL

There is evidence of correlation between inactivation of VHL tumor suppressor gene and increased MET signaling in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and also in malignant transformations of the heart.[63][64]

Cancer therapies targeting HGF/MET

Since tumor invasion and metastasis are the main cause of death in cancer patients, interfering with MET signaling appears to be a promising therapeutic approach. A comprehensive list of HGF and MET targeted experimental therapeutics for oncology now in human clinical trials can be found here.

MET kinase inhibitors

Further information: c-Met inhibitor

Kinase inhibitors are low molecular weight molecules that prevent ATP binding to MET, thus inhibiting receptor transphosphorylation and recruitment of the downstream effectors. The limitations of kinase inhibitors include the facts that they only inhibit kinase-dependent MET activation, and that none of them is fully specific for MET.

  • K252a (Fermentek Biotechnology) is a staurosporine analogue isolated from Nocardiopsis sp. soil fungi, and it is a potent inhibitor of all receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). At nanomolar concentrations, K252a inhibits both the wild type and the mutant (M1268T) MET function.[65]
  • SU11274 (SUGEN) specifically inhibits MET kinase activity and its subsequent signaling. SU11274 is also an effective inhibitor of the M1268T and H1112Y MET mutants, but not the L1213V and Y1248H mutants.[66] SU11274 has been demonstrated to inhibit HGF-induced motility and invasion of epithelial and carcinoma cells.[67]
  • PHA-665752 (Pfizer) specifically inhibits MET kinase activity, and it has been demonstrated to represses both HGF-dependent and constitutive MET phosphorylation.[68] Furthermore, some tumors harboring MET amplifications are highly sensitive to treatment with PHA-665752.[69]
  • Tivantinib (ArQule) is a promising selective inhibitor of MET, which entered a phase 2 clinical trial in 2008. (Failed a phase 3 in 2017)
  • Foretinib (XL880, Exelixis) targets multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) with growth-promoting and angiogenic properties. The primary targets of foretinib are MET, VEGFR2, and KDR. Foretinib has completed a phase 2 clinical trials with indications for papillary renal cell carcinoma, gastric cancer, and head and neck cancer[citation needed]
  • SGX523 (SGX Pharmaceuticals) specifically inhibits MET at low nanomolar concentrations.
  • MP470 (SuperGen) is a novel inhibitor of c-KIT, MET, PDGFR, Flt3, and AXL. Phase I clinical trial of MP470 had been announced in 2007.
  • Vebreltinib, approved in China for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.[70]

HGF inhibitors

Since HGF is the only known ligand of MET, blocking the formation of a HGF:MET complex blocks MET biological activity. For this purpose, truncated HGF, anti-HGF neutralizing antibodies, and an uncleavable form of HGF have been utilized so far. The major limitation of HGF inhibitors is that they block only HGF-dependent MET activation.

  • NK4 competes with HGF as it binds MET without inducing receptor activation, thus behaving as a full antagonist. NK4 is a molecule bearing the N-terminal hairpin and the four kringle domains of HGF. Moreover, NK4 is structurally similar to angiostatins, which is why it possesses anti-angiogenic activity.[71]
  • Neutralizing anti-HGF antibodies were initially tested in combination, and it was shown that at least three antibodies, acting on different HGF epitopes, are necessary to prevent MET tyrosine kinase activation.[72] More recently, it has been demonstrated that fully human monoclonal antibodies can individually bind and neutralize human HGF, leading to regression of tumors in mouse models.[73] Two anti-HGF antibodies are currently available: the humanized AV299 (AVEO), and the fully human AMG102 (Amgen).
  • Uncleavable HGF is an engineered form of pro-HGF carrying a single amino-acid substitution, which prevents the maturation of the molecule. Uncleavable HGF is capable of blocking MET-induced biological responses by binding MET with high affinity and displacing mature HGF. Moreover, uncleavable HGF competes with the wild-type endogenous pro-HGF for the catalytic domain of proteases that cleave HGF precursors. Local and systemic expression of uncleavable HGF inhibits tumor growth and, more importantly, prevents metastasis.

Decoy MET

Decoy MET refers to a soluble truncated MET receptor. Decoys are able to inhibit MET activation mediated by both HGF-dependent and independent mechanisms, as decoys prevent both the ligand binding and the MET receptor homodimerization. CGEN241 (Compugen) is a decoy MET that is highly efficient in inhibiting tumor growth and preventing metastasis in animal models.[74]

Immunotherapy targeting MET

Drugs used for immunotherapy can act either passively by enhancing the immunologic response to MET-expressing tumor cells, or actively by stimulating immune cells and altering differentiation/growth of tumor cells.[75]

Passive immunotherapy

Administering monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is a form of passive immunotherapy. MAbs facilitate destruction of tumor cells by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). In CDC, mAbs bind to specific antigen, leading to activation of the complement cascade, which in turn leads to formation of pores in tumor cells. In ADCC, the Fab domain of a mAb binds to a tumor antigen, and Fc domain binds to Fc receptors present on effector cells (phagocytes and NK cells), thus forming a bridge between an effector and a target cells. This induces the effector cell activation, leading to phagocytosis of the tumor cell by neutrophils and macrophages. Furthermore, NK cells release cytotoxic molecules, which lyse tumor cells.[75]

  • DN30 is monoclonal anti-MET antibody that recognizes the extracellular portion of MET. DN30 induces both shedding of the MET ectodomain as well as cleavage of the intracellular domain, which is successively degraded by proteasome machinery. As a consequence, on one side MET is inactivated, and on the other side the shed portion of extracellular MET hampers activation of other MET receptors, acting as a decoy. DN30 inhibits tumour growth and prevents metastasis in animal models.[76]
  • OA-5D5 is one-armed monoclonal anti-MET antibody that was demonstrated to inhibit orthotopic pancreatic[77] and glioblastoma[78] tumor growth and to improve survival in tumor xenograft models. OA-5D5 is produced as a recombinant protein in Escherichia coli. It is composed of murine variable domains for the heavy and light chains with human IgG1 constant domains. The antibody blocks HGF binding to MET in a competitive fashion.

Active immunotherapy

Active immunotherapy to MET-expressing tumors can be achieved by administering cytokines, such as interferons (IFNs) and interleukins (IL-2), which triggers non-specific stimulation of numerous immune cells. IFNs have been tested as therapies for many types of cancers and have demonstrated therapeutic benefits. IL-2 has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma and metastatic melanoma, which often have deregulated MET activity.[75]

Interactions

Met has been shown to interact with:

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c GRCh38: Ensembl release 89: ENSG00000105976 – Ensembl, May 2017
  2. ^ a b c GRCm38: Ensembl release 89: ENSMUSG00000009376 – Ensembl, May 2017
  3. ^ "Human PubMed Reference:". National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  4. ^ "Mouse PubMed Reference:". National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  5. ^ Bottaro DP, Rubin JS, Faletto DL, Chan AM, Kmiecik TE, Vande Woude GF, et al. (February 1991). "Identification of the hepatocyte growth factor receptor as the c-met proto-oncogene product". Science. 251 (4995): 802–4. Bibcode:1991Sci...251..802B. doi:10.1126/science.1846706. PMID 1846706.
  6. ^ Galland F, Stefanova M, Lafage M, Birnbaum D (1992). "Localization of the 5' end of the MCF2 oncogene to human chromosome 15q15----q23". Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 60 (2): 114–6. doi:10.1159/000133316. PMID 1611909.
  7. ^ Cooper CS (January 1992). "The met oncogene: from detection by transfection to transmembrane receptor for hepatocyte growth factor". Oncogene. 7 (1): 3–7. PMID 1531516.
  8. ^ Cooper CS, Park M, Blair DG, Tainsky MA, Huebner K, Croce CM, et al. (6 September 1984). "Molecular cloning of a new transforming gene from a chemically transformed human cell line". Nature. 311 (5981): 29–33. doi:10.1038/311029a0. PMID 6590967.
  9. ^ Johnson M, Koukoulis G, Kochhar K, Kubo C, Nakamura T, Iyer A (September 1995). "Selective tumorigenesis in non-parenchymal liver epithelial cell lines by hepatocyte growth factor transfection". Cancer Letters. 96 (1): 37–48. doi:10.1016/0304-3835(95)03915-j. PMID 7553606.
  10. ^ Kochhar KS, Johnson ME, Volpert O, Iyer AP (1995). "Evidence for autocrine basis of transformation in NIH-3T3 cells transfected with met/HGF receptor gene". Growth Factors. 12 (4): 303–13. doi:10.3109/08977199509028968. PMID 8930021.
  11. ^ "Entrez Gene: MET met proto-oncogene (hepatocyte growth factor receptor)".
  12. ^ Dean M, Park M, Le Beau MM, Robins TS, Diaz MO, Rowley JD, et al. (1985). "The human met oncogene is related to the tyrosine kinase oncogenes". Nature. 318 (6044): 385–8. Bibcode:1985Natur.318..385D. doi:10.1038/318385a0. PMID 4069211. S2CID 4359961.
  13. ^ a b Birchmeier C, Birchmeier W, Gherardi E, Vande Woude GF (December 2003). "Met, metastasis, motility and more". Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4 (12): 915–25. doi:10.1038/nrm1261. PMID 14685170. S2CID 19330786.
  14. ^ Gandino L, Longati P, Medico E, Prat M, Comoglio PM (January 1994). "Phosphorylation of serine 985 negatively regulates the hepatocyte growth factor receptor kinase". J. Biol. Chem. 269 (3): 1815–20. doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(17)42099-0. PMID 8294430.
  15. ^ Peschard P, Fournier TM, Lamorte L, Naujokas MA, Band H, Langdon WY, et al. (November 2001). "Mutation of the c-Cbl TKB domain binding site on the Met receptor tyrosine kinase converts it into a transforming protein". Mol. Cell. 8 (5): 995–1004. doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00378-1. PMID 11741535.
  16. ^ a b Ponzetto C, Bardelli A, Zhen Z, Maina F, dalla Zonca P, Giordano S, et al. (April 1994). "A multifunctional docking site mediates signaling and transformation by the hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor receptor family". Cell. 77 (2): 261–71. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90318-2. PMID 7513258. S2CID 23383203.
  17. ^ Maina F, Casagranda F, Audero E, Simeone A, Comoglio PM, Klein R, et al. (November 1996). "Uncoupling of Grb2 from the Met receptor in vivo reveals complex roles in muscle development". Cell. 87 (3): 531–42. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81372-0. PMID 8898205. S2CID 12943699.
  18. ^ Johnson M, Kochhar K, Nakamura T, Iyer A (July 1995). "Hepatocyte growth factor-induced signal transduction in two normal mouse epithelial cell lines". Biochemistry and Molecular Biology International. 36 (3): 465–74. PMID 7549943.
  19. ^ a b Pelicci G, Giordano S, Zhen Z, Salcini AE, Lanfrancone L, Bardelli A, et al. (April 1995). "The motogenic and mitogenic responses to HGF are amplified by the Shc adaptor protein". Oncogene. 10 (8): 1631–8. PMID 7731718.
  20. ^ Weidner KM, Di Cesare S, Sachs M, Brinkmann V, Behrens J, Birchmeier W (November 1996). "Interaction between Gab1 and the c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase is responsible for epithelial morphogenesis". Nature. 384 (6605): 173–6. Bibcode:1996Natur.384..173W. doi:10.1038/384173a0. PMID 8906793. S2CID 4357372.
  21. ^ Furge KA, Zhang YW, Vande Woude GF (November 2000). "Met receptor tyrosine kinase: enhanced signaling through adapter proteins". Oncogene. 19 (49): 5582–9. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1203859. PMID 11114738. S2CID 22385297.
  22. ^ Gual P, Giordano S, Anguissola S, Parker PJ, Comoglio PM (January 2001). "Gab1 phosphorylation: a novel mechanism for negative regulation of HGF receptor signaling". Oncogene. 20 (2): 156–66. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1204047. PMID 11313945. S2CID 35447713.
  23. ^ Gual P, Giordano S, Williams TA, Rocchi S, Van Obberghen E, Comoglio PM (March 2000). "Sustained recruitment of phospholipase C-gamma to Gab1 is required for HGF-induced branching tubulogenesis". Oncogene. 19 (12): 1509–18. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1203514. PMID 10734310. S2CID 22727382.
  24. ^ O'Brien LE, Tang K, Kats ES, Schutz-Geschwender A, Lipschutz JH, Mostov KE (July 2004). "ERK and MMPs sequentially regulate distinct stages of epithelial tubule development". Dev. Cell. 7 (1): 21–32. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2004.06.001. PMID 15239951.
  25. ^ Marshall CJ (January 1995). "Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation". Cell. 80 (2): 179–85. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90401-8. PMID 7834738. S2CID 8995643.
  26. ^ Graziani A, Gramaglia D, Cantley LC, Comoglio PM (November 1991). "The tyrosine-phosphorylated hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor receptor associates with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase". J. Biol. Chem. 266 (33): 22087–90. doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(18)54536-1. PMID 1718989.
  27. ^ a b c d Gentile A, Trusolino L, Comoglio PM (March 2008). "The Met tyrosine kinase receptor in development and cancer". Cancer Metastasis Rev. 27 (1): 85–94. doi:10.1007/s10555-007-9107-6. PMID 18175071. S2CID 33076010.
  28. ^ Boccaccio C, Andò M, Tamagnone L, Bardelli A, Michieli P, Battistini C, et al. (January 1998). "Induction of epithelial tubules by growth factor HGF depends on the STAT pathway". Nature. 391 (6664): 285–8. Bibcode:1998Natur.391..285B. doi:10.1038/34657. PMID 9440692. S2CID 30330705.
  29. ^ Monga SP, Mars WM, Pediaditakis P, Bell A, Mulé K, Bowen WC, et al. (April 2002). "Hepatocyte growth factor induces Wnt-independent nuclear translocation of beta-catenin after Met-beta-catenin dissociation in hepatocytes". Cancer Res. 62 (7): 2064–71. PMID 11929826.
  30. ^ a b Abounader R, Reznik T, Colantuoni C, Martinez-Murillo F, Rosen EM, Laterra J (December 2004). "Regulation of c-Met-dependent gene expression by PTEN". Oncogene. 23 (57): 9173–82. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1208146. PMID 15516982. S2CID 7623249.
  31. ^ Gude NA, Emmanuel G, Wu W, Cottage CT, Fischer K, Quijada P, et al. (May 2008). "Activation of Notch-mediated protective signaling in the myocardium". Circ. Res. 102 (9): 1025–35. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.164749. PMC 3760732. PMID 18369158.
  32. ^ Johnson M, Koukoulis G, Matsumoto K, Nakamura T, Iyer A (June 1993). "Hepatocyte growth factor induces proliferation and morphogenesis in nonparenchymal epithelial liver cells". Hepatology. 17 (6): 1052–61. doi:10.1016/0270-9139(93)90122-4. PMID 8514254.
  33. ^ a b "he fields of HGF/c-Met involvement". HealthValue. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 13 June 2009.
  34. ^ a b c d Boccaccio C, Comoglio PM (August 2006). "Invasive growth: a MET-driven genetic programme for cancer and stem cells". Nat. Rev. Cancer. 6 (8): 637–45. doi:10.1038/nrc1912. PMID 16862193. S2CID 396385.
  35. ^ Birchmeier C, Gherardi E (October 1998). "Developmental roles of HGF/SF and its receptor, the c-Met tyrosine kinase". Trends Cell Biol. 8 (10): 404–10. doi:10.1016/S0962-8924(98)01359-2. PMID 9789329.
  36. ^ Uehara Y, Minowa O, Mori C, Shiota K, Kuno J, Noda T, et al. (February 1995). "Placental defect and embryonic lethality in mice lacking hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor". Nature. 373 (6516): 702–5. Bibcode:1995Natur.373..702U. doi:10.1038/373702a0. PMID 7854453. S2CID 4361262.
  37. ^ Barrow-McGee R, Kishi N, Joffre C, Ménard L, Hervieu A, Bakhouche BA, et al. (2016). "Beta 1-integrin-c-Met cooperation reveals an inside-in survival signalling on autophagy-related endomembranes". Nature Communications. 7: 11942. Bibcode:2016NatCo...711942B. doi:10.1038/ncomms11942. PMC 4931016. PMID 27336951.
  38. ^ Rappolee DA, Iyer A, Patel Y (June 1996). "Hepatocyte growth factor and its receptor are expressed in cardiac myocytes during early cardiogenesis". Circulation Research. 78 (6): 1028–36. doi:10.1161/01.RES.78.6.1028. PMID 8635233.
  39. ^ Song W, Majka SM, McGuire PG (1999). "Hepatocyte growth factor expression in the developing myocardium: evidence for a role in the regulation of the mesenchymal cell phenotype and urokinase expression". Developmental Dynamics. 214 (1): 92–100. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199901)214:1<92::AID-DVDY9>3.0.CO;2-X. PMID 9915579.
  40. ^ a b Arechederra M, Carmona R, González-Nuñez M, Gutiérrez-Uzquiza A, Bragado P, Cruz-González I, et al. (December 2013). "Met signaling in cardiomyocytes is required for normal cardiac function in adult mice" (PDF). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease. 1832 (12): 2204–15. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.08.008. PMID 23994610.
  41. ^ Leo C, Sala V, Morello M, Chiribiri A, Riess I, Mancardi D, et al. (9 February 2011). "Activated Met signalling in the developing mouse heart leads to cardiac disease". PLOS ONE. 6 (2): e14675. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...614675L. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014675. PMC 3036588. PMID 21347410.
  42. ^ a b Shirasaki F, Makhluf HA, LeRoy C, Watson DK, Trojanowska M (December 1999). "Ets transcription factors cooperate with Sp1 to activate the human tenascin-C promoter". Oncogene. 18 (54): 7755–64. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1203360. PMID 10618716.
  43. ^ Gambarotta G, Boccaccio C, Giordano S, Andŏ M, Stella MC, Comoglio PM (November 1996). "Ets up-regulates MET transcription". Oncogene. 13 (9): 1911–7. PMID 8934537.
  44. ^ Pennacchietti S, Michieli P, Galluzzo M, Mazzone M, Giordano S, Comoglio PM (April 2003). "Hypoxia promotes invasive growth by transcriptional activation of the met protooncogene". Cancer Cell. 3 (4): 347–61. doi:10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00085-0. PMID 12726861.
  45. ^ "HGF/c-Met and cancer". HealthValue. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 13 June 2009.
  46. ^ Kim S, Lee UJ, Kim MN, Lee EJ, Kim JY, Lee MY, et al. (June 2008). "MicroRNA miR-199a* regulates the MET proto-oncogene and the downstream extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 (ERK2)". J. Biol. Chem. 283 (26): 18158–66. doi:10.1074/jbc.M800186200. PMID 18456660.
  47. ^ del Carmen MG, Birrer M, Schorge JO (September 2012). "Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a review of the literature". Gynecol. Oncol. 126 (3): 481–90. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.04.021. PMID 22525820.
  48. ^ Bardelli A, Corso S, Bertotti A, Hobor S, Valtorta E, Siravegna G, et al. (June 2013). "Amplification of the MET receptor drives resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in colorectal cancer". Cancer Discov. 3 (6): 658–73. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0558. PMC 4078408. PMID 23729478.
  49. ^ Campbell DB, Sutcliffe JS, Ebert PJ, Militerni R, Bravaccio C, Trillo S, et al. (2006). "A genetic variant that disrupts MET transcription is associated with autism". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 (45): 16834–9. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605296103. PMC 1838551. PMID 17053076.
  50. ^ Campbell DB, Buie TM, Winter H, Bauman M, Sutcliffe JS, Perrin JM, et al. (2009). "Distinct genetic risk based on association of MET in families with co-occurring autism and gastrointestinal conditions". Pediatrics. 123 (3): 1018–24. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-0819. PMID 19255034. S2CID 5395283.
  51. ^ Lambert N, Wermenbol V, Pichon B, Acosta S, van den Ameele J, Perazzolo C, et al. (2014). "A familial heterozygous null mutation of MET in autism spectrum disorder". Autism Res. 7 (5): 617–22. doi:10.1002/aur.1396. PMID 24909855. S2CID 5608613.
  52. ^ Qiu S, Lu Z, Levitt P (2014). "MET receptor tyrosine kinase controls dendritic complexity, spine morphogenesis, and glutamatergic synapse maturation in the hippocampus". J. Neurosci. 34 (49): 16166–79. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2580-14.2014. PMC 4252539. PMID 25471559.
  53. ^ Eagleson KL, Milner TA, Xie Z, Levitt P (2013). "Synaptic and extrasynaptic location of the receptor tyrosine kinase met during postnatal development in the mouse neocortex and hippocampus". J. Comp. Neurol. 521 (14): 3241–59. doi:10.1002/cne.23343. PMC 3942873. PMID 23787772.
  54. ^ Judson MC, Eagleson KL, Levitt P (2011). "A new synaptic player leading to autism risk: Met receptor tyrosine kinase". J Neurodev Disord. 3 (3): 282–92. doi:10.1007/s11689-011-9081-8. PMC 3261279. PMID 21509596.
  55. ^ Qiu S, Anderson CT, Levitt P, Shepherd GM (2011). "Circuit-specific intracortical hyperconnectivity in mice with deletion of the autism-associated Met receptor tyrosine kinase". J. Neurosci. 31 (15): 5855–64. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6569-10.2011. PMC 3086026. PMID 21490227.
  56. ^ Judson MC, Eagleson KL, Wang L, Levitt P (2010). "Evidence of cell-nonautonomous changes in dendrite and dendritic spine morphology in the met-signaling-deficient mouse forebrain". J. Comp. Neurol. 518 (21): 4463–78. doi:10.1002/cne.22467. PMC 2952412. PMID 20853516.
  57. ^ Rudie JD, Hernandez LM, Brown JA, Beck-Pancer D, Colich NL, Gorrindo P, et al. (2012). "Autism-associated promoter variant in MET impacts functional and structural brain networks". Neuron. 75 (5): 904–15. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.07.010. PMC 3454529. PMID 22958829.
  58. ^ Doherty KR, Wappel RL, Talbert DR, Trusk PB, Moran DM, Kramer JW, et al. (October 2013). "Multi-parameter in vitro toxicity testing of crizotinib, sunitinib, erlotinib, and nilotinib in human cardiomyocytes". Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 272 (1): 245–55. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2013.04.027. PMID 23707608.
  59. ^ Aguirre SA, Heyen JR, Collette W, Bobrowski W, Blasi ER (April 2010). "Cardiovascular effects in rats following exposure to a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor". Toxicologic Pathology. 38 (3): 416–28. doi:10.1177/0192623310364027. PMID 20231546.
  60. ^ Schmoldt A, Benthe HF, Haberland G, Scott WA, Mahoney E, Pounds JG, et al. (February 1991). "Cellular and molecular toxicity of lead in bone". Environmental Health Perspectives. 91 (17): 17–32. doi:10.1289/ehp.919117. PMC 1519349. PMID 2040247.
  61. ^ Sala V, Crepaldi T (May 2011). "Novel therapy for myocardial infarction: can HGF/Met be beneficial?". Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 68 (10): 1703–17. doi:10.1007/s00018-011-0633-6. PMC 11114731. PMID 21327916. S2CID 32535928.
  62. ^ Maehama T, Dixon JE (May 1998). "The tumor suppressor, PTEN/MMAC1, dephosphorylates the lipid second messenger, phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate". J. Biol. Chem. 273 (22): 13375–8. doi:10.1074/jbc.273.22.13375. PMID 9593664.
  63. ^ Morris MR, Gentle D, Abdulrahman M, Maina EN, Gupta K, Banks RE, et al. (June 2005). "Tumor suppressor activity and epigenetic inactivation of hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor type 2/SPINT2 in papillary and clear cell renal cell carcinoma". Cancer Res. 65 (11): 4598–606. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3371. PMID 15930277.
  64. ^ Lei L, Mason S, Liu D, Huang Y, Marks C, Hickey R, et al. (June 2008). "Hypoxia-inducible factor-dependent degeneration, failure, and malignant transformation of the heart in the absence of the von Hippel-Lindau protein". Molecular and Cellular Biology. 28 (11): 3790–803. doi:10.1128/MCB.01580-07. PMC 2423296. PMID 18285456.
  65. ^ Morotti A, Mila S, Accornero P, Tagliabue E, Ponzetto C (July 2002). "K252a inhibits the oncogenic properties of Met, the HGF receptor". Oncogene. 21 (32): 4885–93. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1205622. PMID 12118367. S2CID 32305287.
  66. ^ Berthou S, Aebersold DM, Schmidt LS, Stroka D, Heigl C, Streit B, et al. (July 2004). "The Met kinase inhibitor SU11274 exhibits a selective inhibition pattern toward different receptor mutated variants". Oncogene. 23 (31): 5387–93. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207691. PMID 15064724. S2CID 12545344.
  67. ^ Wang X, Le P, Liang C, Chan J, Kiewlich D, Miller T, et al. (November 2003). "Potent and selective inhibitors of the Met [hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) receptor] tyrosine kinase block HGF/SF-induced tumor cell growth and invasion". Mol. Cancer Ther. 2 (11): 1085–92. PMID 14617781.
  68. ^ Christensen JG, Schreck R, Burrows J, Kuruganti P, Chan E, Le P, et al. (November 2003). "A selective small molecule inhibitor of c-Met kinase inhibits c-Met-dependent phenotypes in vitro and exhibits cytoreductive antitumor activity in vivo". Cancer Res. 63 (21): 7345–55. PMID 14612533.
  69. ^ Smolen GA, Sordella R, Muir B, Mohapatra G, Barmettler A, Archibald H, et al. (February 2006). "Amplification of MET may identify a subset of cancers with extreme sensitivity to the selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor PHA-665752". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 (7): 2316–21. Bibcode:2006PNAS..103.2316S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0508776103. PMC 1413705. PMID 16461907.
  70. ^ "Vebreltinib Receives Approval in China For MET Exon 14+ NSCLC". onclive.com. 16 November 2023.
  71. ^ Matsumoto K, Nakamura T (April 2003). "NK4 (HGF-antagonist/angiogenesis inhibitor) in cancer biology and therapeutics". Cancer Sci. 94 (4): 321–7. doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2003.tb01440.x. PMC 11160298. PMID 12824898. S2CID 24806218.
  72. ^ Cao B, Su Y, Oskarsson M, Zhao P, Kort EJ, Fisher RJ, et al. (June 2001). "Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) display antitumor activity in animal models". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 (13): 7443–8. Bibcode:2001PNAS...98.7443C. doi:10.1073/pnas.131200498. PMC 34688. PMID 11416216.
  73. ^ Burgess T, Coxon A, Meyer S, Sun J, Rex K, Tsuruda T, et al. (February 2006). "Fully human monoclonal antibodies to hepatocyte growth factor with therapeutic potential against hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met-dependent human tumors". Cancer Res. 66 (3): 1721–9. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3329. PMID 16452232.
  74. ^ Michieli P, Mazzone M, Basilico C, Cavassa S, Sottile A, Naldini L, et al. (July 2004). "Targeting the tumor and its microenvironment by a dual-function decoy Met receptor". Cancer Cell. 6 (1): 61–73. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2004.05.032. PMID 15261142.
  75. ^ a b c Reang P, Gupta M, Kohli K (2006). "Biological response modifiers in cancer". MedGenMed. 8 (4): 33. PMC 1868326. PMID 17415315.
  76. ^ Petrelli A, Circosta P, Granziero L, Mazzone M, Pisacane A, Fenoglio S, et al. (March 2006). "Ab-induced ectodomain shedding mediates hepatocyte growth factor receptor down-regulation and hampers biological activity". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 (13): 5090–5. Bibcode:2006PNAS..103.5090P. doi:10.1073/pnas.0508156103. PMC 1458799. PMID 16547140.
  77. ^ Jin H, Yang R, Zheng Z, Romero M, Ross J, Bou-Reslan H, et al. (June 2008). "MetMAb, the one-armed 5D5 anti-c-Met antibody, inhibits orthotopic pancreatic tumor growth and improves survival". Cancer Res. 68 (11): 4360–8. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5960. PMID 18519697.
  78. ^ Martens T, Schmidt NO, Eckerich C, Fillbrandt R, Merchant M, Schwall R, et al. (October 2006). "A novel one-armed anti-c-Met antibody inhibits glioblastoma growth in vivo". Clin. Cancer Res. 12 (20 Pt 1): 6144–52. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1418. PMID 17062691.
  79. ^ Davies G, Jiang WG, Mason MD (2001). "HGF/SF modifies the interaction between its receptor c-Met, and the E-cadherin/catenin complex in prostate cancer cells". Int. J. Mol. Med. 7 (4): 385–8. doi:10.3892/ijmm.7.4.385. PMID 11254878.
  80. ^ Petrelli A, Gilestro GF, Lanzardo S, Comoglio PM, Migone N, Giordano S (2002). "The endophilin-CIN85-Cbl complex mediates ligand-dependent downregulation of c-Met". Nature. 416 (6877): 187–90. Bibcode:2002Natur.416..187P. doi:10.1038/416187a. PMID 11894096. S2CID 4389099.
  81. ^ Ng C, Jackson RA, Buschdorf JP, Sun Q, Guy GR, Sivaraman J (2008). "Structural basis for a novel intrapeptidyl H-bond and reverse binding of c-Cbl-TKB domain substrates". EMBO J. 27 (5): 804–16. doi:10.1038/emboj.2008.18. PMC 2265755. PMID 18273061.
  82. ^ Grisendi S, Chambraud B, Gout I, Comoglio PM, Crepaldi T (2001). "Ligand-regulated binding of FAP68 to the hepatocyte growth factor receptor". J. Biol. Chem. 276 (49): 46632–8. doi:10.1074/jbc.M104323200. PMID 11571281.
  83. ^ Ponzetto C, Zhen Z, Audero E, Maina F, Bardelli A, Basile ML, et al. (1996). "Specific uncoupling of GRB2 from the Met receptor. Differential effects on transformation and motility". J. Biol. Chem. 271 (24): 14119–23. doi:10.1074/jbc.271.24.14119. PMID 8662889.
  84. ^ Liang Q, Mohan RR, Chen L, Wilson SE (1998). "Signaling by HGF and KGF in corneal epithelial cells: Ras/MAP kinase and Jak-STAT pathways". Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 39 (8): 1329–38. PMID 9660480.
  85. ^ Comoglio PM (1993). "Structure, biosynthesis and biochemical properties of the HGF receptor in normal and malignant cells". EXS. 65: 131–65. PMID 8380735.
  86. ^ Naldini L, Weidner KM, Vigna E, Gaudino G, Bardelli A, Ponzetto C, et al. (1991). "Scatter factor and hepatocyte growth factor are indistinguishable ligands for the MET receptor". EMBO J. 10 (10): 2867–78. doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07836.x. PMC 452997. PMID 1655405.
  87. ^ Hiscox S, Jiang WG (1999). "Association of the HGF/SF receptor, c-met, with the cell-surface adhesion molecule, E-cadherin, and catenins in human tumor cells". Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 261 (2): 406–11. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1999.1002. PMID 10425198.
  88. ^ Wang D, Li Z, Messing EM, Wu G (2002). "Activation of Ras/Erk pathway by a novel MET-interacting protein RanBPM". J. Biol. Chem. 277 (39): 36216–22. doi:10.1074/jbc.M205111200. PMID 12147692.

Further reading
Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya